Soon after taking over in 2007, British Petroleum’s (BP) newly appointed chief executive told an audience of business students at Stanford University that he thought too many people at the company were “trying to save the world.”
Tony Hayward’s comments were intended to set the tone for his tenure at the helm of Britain’s third-largest company, but those words have returned to haunt him this week as BP struggles to contain one of the darkest chapters in its history — a massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico that has led to a state of emergency in Louisana.
His speech went down well. Hayward’s focus on core values — on oil and gas as the only credible source of long-term profit — was a welcome relief to industry observers. His predecessor had made worrying statements about BP becoming an “energy company,” able to exploit the anticipated growth in clean technology to deliver a business model suited to a carbon-constrained world. An attractive green logo had been unveiled, the words “beyond petroleum” inserted elegantly beneath.
‘BEYOND PETROLEUM’ NO MORE
Fast forward to this year and BP’s alternative energy division has been left to wither on the vine. The solar business is a distant memory and this year the company has allocated less than US$1 billion to its entire low-carbon portfolio, now mainly comprised of biofuels. In contrast, the company is planning to spend 20 times that amount extracting oil and gas from increasingly unconventional sources, including the tar sands of Canada.
The success of this strategy relies on acquiescence by political leaders in the countries in which BP operates. Under former US president George W. Bush the need for lobbying muscle was minimal, but since the arrival of US President Barack Obama, BP has poured millions into Washington, mainly through third-party lobby groups.
Organizations such as the American Petroleum Institute, funded in part by BP, have done the company’s dirty work for it. Supposedly spontaneous citizen demonstrations against climate legislation have sprung up around the US, before journalists revealed they were actually populated by employees of the oil companies themselves.
The climate bill that had, until recently, a sliver of Republican support paid a heavy price for this cross-party endorsement in terms of funding for a series of environmentally dubious projects. The most controversial concession now looks almost certain to be reconsidered — the opening up of the coastal waters of the US to offshore drilling.
DISREGARDING SAFETY
As officials in Louisiana begin to face the reality of the spill that has now reached their fragile coastline, many will be asking if BP did everything in its power to prevent this kind of accident. Reports last week suggest that last year a senior BP executive lobbied against mandatory safety codes for offshore drilling, arguing that the regulation would be too onerous and would slow down the construction of new rigs. Industry pressure had the desired effect, but it will be up to accident investigators to decide if a code could have helped avoid the initial explosion on April 20.
What BP will never admit, among their glossy brochures and extensive environmental assessments, is that its entire business model is predicated on an ever-increasing demand for oil, decades into the future. These growth predictions rely on a world in which there is no collective action to tackle global emissions, no concerted effort to transfer clean technology to the developing world and almost no chance of maintaining anything like a stable climate.
As more oil drifts toward the critical wetlands of the Mississippi Delta, we must hope that the more thoughtful members of BP’s board will feel obliged to question the wisdom of a strategy that is, at its core, unchanged since the opening decades of the 20th century.
John Sauven is executive director of Greenpeace UK.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US