Soon after taking over in 2007, British Petroleum’s (BP) newly appointed chief executive told an audience of business students at Stanford University that he thought too many people at the company were “trying to save the world.”
Tony Hayward’s comments were intended to set the tone for his tenure at the helm of Britain’s third-largest company, but those words have returned to haunt him this week as BP struggles to contain one of the darkest chapters in its history — a massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico that has led to a state of emergency in Louisana.
His speech went down well. Hayward’s focus on core values — on oil and gas as the only credible source of long-term profit — was a welcome relief to industry observers. His predecessor had made worrying statements about BP becoming an “energy company,” able to exploit the anticipated growth in clean technology to deliver a business model suited to a carbon-constrained world. An attractive green logo had been unveiled, the words “beyond petroleum” inserted elegantly beneath.
‘BEYOND PETROLEUM’ NO MORE
Fast forward to this year and BP’s alternative energy division has been left to wither on the vine. The solar business is a distant memory and this year the company has allocated less than US$1 billion to its entire low-carbon portfolio, now mainly comprised of biofuels. In contrast, the company is planning to spend 20 times that amount extracting oil and gas from increasingly unconventional sources, including the tar sands of Canada.
The success of this strategy relies on acquiescence by political leaders in the countries in which BP operates. Under former US president George W. Bush the need for lobbying muscle was minimal, but since the arrival of US President Barack Obama, BP has poured millions into Washington, mainly through third-party lobby groups.
Organizations such as the American Petroleum Institute, funded in part by BP, have done the company’s dirty work for it. Supposedly spontaneous citizen demonstrations against climate legislation have sprung up around the US, before journalists revealed they were actually populated by employees of the oil companies themselves.
The climate bill that had, until recently, a sliver of Republican support paid a heavy price for this cross-party endorsement in terms of funding for a series of environmentally dubious projects. The most controversial concession now looks almost certain to be reconsidered — the opening up of the coastal waters of the US to offshore drilling.
DISREGARDING SAFETY
As officials in Louisiana begin to face the reality of the spill that has now reached their fragile coastline, many will be asking if BP did everything in its power to prevent this kind of accident. Reports last week suggest that last year a senior BP executive lobbied against mandatory safety codes for offshore drilling, arguing that the regulation would be too onerous and would slow down the construction of new rigs. Industry pressure had the desired effect, but it will be up to accident investigators to decide if a code could have helped avoid the initial explosion on April 20.
What BP will never admit, among their glossy brochures and extensive environmental assessments, is that its entire business model is predicated on an ever-increasing demand for oil, decades into the future. These growth predictions rely on a world in which there is no collective action to tackle global emissions, no concerted effort to transfer clean technology to the developing world and almost no chance of maintaining anything like a stable climate.
As more oil drifts toward the critical wetlands of the Mississippi Delta, we must hope that the more thoughtful members of BP’s board will feel obliged to question the wisdom of a strategy that is, at its core, unchanged since the opening decades of the 20th century.
John Sauven is executive director of Greenpeace UK.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS