On April 11, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) began a series of public forums, the first on the aging population. The second, on the environment, was on Thursday, with plans for others ranging from globalization to international relations, including with China.
These meetings are meant to open a public dialogue to help the DPP map a 10-year policy platform. Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has given the project the highest priority, although she says it will not replace fundamental party values.
Tsai, who is up for re-election next month, believes that the DPP must prepare to govern Taiwan’s next generation. She has criticized politicians for being too concerned with short-term objectives and has vowed to make the DPP a party that is “insightful and forward-looking.”
The DPP is at an historic juncture. Soundly defeated in the 2008 presidential election, the DPP has made something of a comeback in recent months. Under Tsai’s leadership, the party made significant gains in legislative by-elections by capitalizing on the economic downturn and on a string of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) political blunders since the party assumed power.
However, the DPP remains in a precarious position. Inspiring as they were, last year’s victories added little to the party’s legislative power. In addition, the gains that were made were due to declining KMT popularity rather than anything the DPP had done to gain support.
As Tsai is likely to be re-elected as party chair next month, two things are worth considering concerning how she will lead the DPP at this important time.
First is the relationship between Tsai’s 10-year plan and the party’s election strategy. The DPP has a great deal riding on polls in November and in 2012. Recent momentum must be sustained and if the party doesn’t win the presidency at the next election, it must make a serious challenge. Another poor showing could be fatal.
Yet Tsai has denied that the new long-term platform will be an issue in either of these elections.
It may be that she is playing down the plan to avoid alarming core supporters. Or she may hope to evade countermeasures by flying under the KMT’s radar. Either way, it is not the time for the DPP to hide its light under a bushel.
Beginning with its series of public forums — which are a welcome relief from the KMT’s dictatorial approach to policy — the 10-year plan is an excellent initiative that should be front and center in DPP election strategy over the next two years.
In addition to its democratic approach, the plan notably broadens the party’s platform, distinguishing it from the KMT and giving it the credibility it lacked as a viable political alternative. Nothing could be more damaging to the 2012 DPP campaign than to appear to have been merely obstructionist during its time in opposition.
The second thing to consider about Tsai’s next term as chair is how the new platform addresses relations with China. Taiwanese sovereignty has long been the DPP’s main reason for being, and given the trouble this caused the previous DPP government, it is clear that everything will depend on resolving this.
Recalling the DPP’s Taiwan Independence Clause (台獨黨綱) in 1991, Resolution on Taiwan’s Future (台灣前途決議文) in 1999, and the Normal Country Resolution (正常國家決議文) in 2007, it is clear the party is capable of amending its platform to keep pace with changes in geopolitics.
Yet this is really the No. 1 problem now facing the DPP. Any chance of mounting a serious challenge in 2012 will depend on winning support from political moderates and they remain skeptical of the party’s ability to manage relations across the strait.
Tsai must be pragmatic in reducing tensions with China. She must also be critical and creative in fashioning a policy that succeeds, while not merely capitulating to military and economic pressure.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS