The drought in southwestern China has attracted much attention lately. Almost every year, the Chinese government lists investment in construction projects for hydraulic facilities used by farmlands as one of its major policies. In reality, however, they have been unsuccessful in effectively carrying out this policy.
Massive hydraulic construction projects still receive government financing, but over the last 30 years, there have been almost no upgrades to small reservoirs and irrigation canals in rural areas. Of the 4 trillion yuan (US$585.9 billion) the Chinese government invested in its domestic economy last year, only an extremely small portion was spent on hydraulic facilities for farmlands. This is directly responsible for rural areas’ inability to fight drought.
The huge sums of money invested by the Chinese government are basically aimed at things that can bring direct economic gain to local governments. A lot of these investments have in fact been disastrous for the environment and for ecological conservation.
For example, the rubber industry in Yunnan Province has always been one of the province’s main industries. From 1994 to 2007, the purchase price of unvulcanized rubber skyrocketed by 900 percent. However, tests from official geographic information systems have also shown that big rubber plantations have affected the climate in Yunnan, causing the average temperature in the region to increase by 0.4°C to 0.5°C over the last 10 years.
Furthermore, mass planting of eucalyptus trees is something that has started in China as the pulp and papermaking industries have developed. The People’s Government of Yunnan Province, in particular, has assisted companies in the paper industry to build up massive stocks of timber and these companies have acquired large areas of land, including mountain and forest areas.
In just a few years, 12.14 million hectares of eucalyptus trees and other fast-growing trees replaced the original natural forests and alpine vegetation. These large areas of eucalyptus trees have been called “green deserts” because there are no birds in the trees and no vegetation beneath them.
The negative effects on the environment of these plantations are being compared to that of massive hydropower development projects.
In other words, the aggressive economic development strategies of local governments are one of the main reasons why natural disasters are becoming more and more prevalent.
There is an even more serious problem behind these economic development strategies and that is the unequal distribution of water resources. In China, cities and industries receive more water resources than agricultural areas and farmers. When serious droughts last for months on end, it is the villages and peasants that are hurt the most.
The reason behind this situation is the unequal distribution of power and rights. In addition, farmers, including those who are affected by droughts, have no way of organizing groups to fight for their rights and are unable to make their demands known via regular channels.
This is a form of manmade disaster and it is something that the Chinese government is trying very hard to ignore and avoid taking responsibility for. This is a growing issue that we cannot afford to ignore any longer.
Wang Dan is a prominent figure in China’s democracy movement and holds a PhD in history from Harvard University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS