Minister of Health Yaung Chih-liang (楊志良) had to threaten to resign to show that he was serious, but now President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has finally lent his support to raising National Health Insurance (NHI) premiums and implementing a second-generation health insurance system. On Thursday, the Cabinet also approved a change to NHI regulations that could be a shot in the arm for Taiwan’s health insurance system, which has earned praise in Taiwan and abroad.
The question now is whether implementing the second generation of the NHI will guarantee a sound system. Given the current situation, there is little reason to be optimistic.
The current plan focuses on improving the NHI’s finances by raising premiums and by calculating premiums based on annual household income instead of registered insurance subscriptions — roughly equivalent to an employee’s monthly salary.
Although the Cabinet stresses that premiums will not rise for 60 percent of those insured, premiums will rise for many to pay for the huge and constantly increasing NHI deficit.
Most people are unlikely to complain if increasing their insurance premiums by a sum equivalent to the cost of a lunchbox will help maintain a sustainable health insurance system. If they think implementing the second-generation NHI system will resolve the deficit problem, however, they are naive.
The second-generation system aims to raise premiums and increase revenues to solve the most urgent problem, but to this day, the Department of Health (DOH) hasn’t offered any concrete suggestions on how to cut expenditures. In only 13 years, from 1996 to last year, the NHI’s medical expenditures more than doubled from NT$224.8 billion (US$7.13 billion) to NT$470 billion, and it is expected to keep rising between 3 percent and 5 percent annually.
If the government doesn’t fix all the leaks, these increases will cause the deficit to skyrocket in just a few years.
The problem with health insurance expenditures is an open secret. Hospitals and clinics report an exaggerated number of patients, and doctors exaggerate their NHI expenses by extending treatments and making unnecessary examinations and operations. In addition, hospitals negotiate prices with drug companies annually to cut costs, but then report inflated prices to the Bureau of National Health Insurance. The bureau reimburses the hospitals, which pocket the difference between actual and reported prices.
These irregularities are common knowledge, so why doesn’t the second-generation NHI address these practices? Because this is a matter of shared interests. Many of the DOH’s public health policies require the cooperation of hospitals, so as long as hospitals are not too out of line, the DOH will not interfere too much with the practical aspects of their business.
Doctors and pharmaceutical companies are two of the most privileged pressure groups, and many political contributions in Taiwan’s elections come from the latter group. As soon as the debate turns toward health insurance reform, vested interests in the pharmaceutical industry that stand to lose pressure the Cabinet and legislators. Reform measures aimed at eliminating irregularities quickly fade away and debate about health insurance reform is forever doomed to address only one half of the problem — the revenue side.
As the government implements the second generation of the NHI, it should not ask the public for money while closing its eyes to the pharmaceutical industry’s behavior and allowing irregularities to continue. The government must make concrete reforms to cut expenditures — if it continues to direct reforms at only half the problem, the second-generation NHI system is doomed to failure.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
RSS