Homosexuality is not a disease, but homophobia is. Characterized by irrational hatred and fear of homosexuality, it creates hostility, causes harm and can even kill.
On March 29, several gay and gender equality groups went to the Control Yuan to demand the Taipei City government’s impeachment for discriminating against homosexual adolescents after the city’s Department of Education banned school clubs from engaging in gay-related activities.
After the gay community’s protest at Taipei City Hall on March 2, the city government and Taipei City Council said they support and respect homosexuals, and that their intention had been misunderstood. The council had already demonstrated its homophobia, however, in an action that severely restricts homosexual teens.
In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality as a disorder. The late US theorist Eve Sedgwick said in 1998 that this was hypocritical because of a concomitant demand that two conditions be met: A homosexual must be an adult, and homosexuals must behave according to society’s mainstream gender standards. Homosexual men must behave “like men” and homosexual women must behave “like women” to be considered not to be suffering from a disorder. Homophobia was thus rationalized.
In the protest at city hall, the city government’s homophobia was clear, for all their talk about respect and support for homosexuals.
Homophobia first reared its head at a meeting of the city council’s Civil Affairs Committee to review the budget for gay-related activities, when some councilors issued a resolution demanding the city ban such activities at schools up to senior-high level. This resolution, which ignores adolescents’ right to develop their sexuality and violates the Gender Equality in Education Act (性別平等教育法), is a clear expression of homophobia.
The Department of Civil Affairs then sent the council’s illegal resolution unchanged to the Department of Education. This was not very surprising, as homophobia runs deep in that department. In 2006, 2007 and 2008, the Department of Civil Affairs constantly caused trouble by claiming the men in posters for gay events were not masculine enough and the women were not sufficiently feminine to meet public expectations of “normal homosexuals.”
After the protest, the Department of Education — the authority charged with upholding the Gender Equality Education Act — issued two official documents clarifying its position. Preposterously, despite the department’s slighting of homosexuals in the original document, these two official documents repeatedly mentioned “gender equality,” but omitted the word “gay.”
Most homosexual adolescents are left alone on their way to adulthood and have to deal with constant frustrations. They have no support and no way out, and many consider suicide. Some parents even try exorcism or take their children to psychiatrists. They would rather have their children run away from home or even end their lives than accept their homosexuality.
When a cruiser carrying 381 gay people arrived in Taiwan a few days ago, an envious tourist said: “Taiwan is so gay-friendly. We can go to gay bars and have fun all night. We want to make more friends there.”
This is exasperating. These adult homosexuals who think Taiwan is so gay-friendly survived their adolescence, but do they know how difficult that is in Taiwan? Only by surviving adolescence are homosexuals able to enjoy this “gay friendliness” as they become adults.
Wang Ping is secretary-general of the Gender/Sexuality Rights Association Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under