Thou shalt not kill
Referring to the 44 convicts on death row in Taiwan, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) said last week: “I’m glad that the devils can finally go to hell” (“Lawmakers acclaim Wang’s resignation,” March 13, page 3).
How fortunate Taiwan is to have government officials who are tactful enough to choose their words wisely while speaking publicly.
Lo is either ignorant of, or has forgotten, Jesus’ admonishment in Matthew 7:1 — “Judge not, so that you yourselves be not also judged.”
Moreover, before he goes on condemning people to eternal damnation and perdition, Lo had best give some thought to the expression that only madmen and savages profess to know the mind of God.
An absolutely crucial fact that one must keep in mind is that of the 44 convicts presently on death row in Taiwan, there is a possibility that a number of them are not guilty of the crimes they were accused of.
A perfect example of this phenomenon is the group of men referred to as the “Hsichih Trio” [Editor’s note: The “Hsichih Trio” are not among the 44 individuals on death row].
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), when he was minister of justice, refused to sign the trio’s execution order for lack of evidence, while US forensics expert Henry Lee (李昌鈺) testified in the trio’s favor in court in May 2007.
In 2003, the three men were freed after the High Court overturned their sentences. The Taiwan Supreme Court then ordered the High Court to “re-examine” the case. On June 29, 2007, the High Court issued a guilty verdict. It also reinstated the death penalty.
Protesters outside the courtroom began to scream that the Taiwanese judicial system was guilty and that the defendants were innocent.
One of the defense lawyers, Su You-chen (蘇友辰), said: “The ruling is ridiculous. The judicial system is stained. Judicial reform is bullshit.”
Here’s a question we should all be asking ourselves: Would it be preferable to let 100 guilty people go free rather than have one innocent person unjustly imprisoned?
I shudder with revulsion, fear and disgust when I think about how many of the 44 convicts currently on death row in Taiwan may be innocent.
This is one of the strongest arguments against the death penalty — that there will always be a significant danger that an innocent person will be condemned to death.
The danger is all the greater in Taiwan, where the judicial system is stained red with human blood. It is easily manipulated and abused. Far too often, it is used as a “club” to smash the heads of people whose only crime is to have said or done something to anger a powerful and influential politician. It is a disgrace.
Former minister of justice Wang Ching-fen (王清峰) said she would rather “go to hell” than order the executions of the 44 convicts on death row.
There is no doubt in my mind that Wang is a sincere, courageous woman with the highest ethical principles.
However, there is precious little difference between capital punishment and a life term in prison. The former kills quickly, while the latter tortures someone to death slowly.
Former president Chen Shu-bian (陳水扁) is facing such torture. Chen, like Wang, was a human rights activist. Does Chen truly deserve life imprisonment? Does no one see the irony of this man who once crusaded for human rights — and through his efforts, saving the lives of those unjustly imprisoned — now himself being horribly victimized with the unspeakable burden of life in prison?
MICHAEL SCANLON
East Hartford, Connecticut
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Workers’ rights groups on July 17 called on the Ministry of Labor to protect migrant fishers, days after CNN reported what it described as a “pattern of abuse” in Taiwan’s distant-water fishing industry. The report detailed the harrowing account of Indonesian migrant fisher Silwanus Tangkotta, who crushed his fingers in a metal door last year while aboard a Taiwanese fishing vessel. The captain reportedly refused to return to port for medical treatment, as they “hadn’t caught enough fish to justify the trip.” Tangkotta lost two fingers, and was fired and denied compensation upon returning to land. Another former migrant fisher, Adrian Dogdodo
RSS