Since arriving to a hero’s welcome late last month, the former chief international nuclear watchdog and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Mohammed ElBaradei has taken on Egypt’s leadership in the way you might expect of a career diplomat: using delicate language and a non-confrontational approach.
For all the gentle words, however, his whirlwind interviews made it clear that he had come home to shake up the leadership’s long monopoly on power, even as he continued to dance around the question of whether he would run for president.
His message as he dominated the media was a call for Egyptians to press their government for more political freedoms, a provocation in a country where dissent is hardly tolerated and where a viable political opposition has not been allowed to grow. His point was this: Without amending the constitution to allow fully free elections, Egypt could not improve any of the deep social and economic problems that had been allowed to fester under the governing party.
“My goal is that there wouldn’t be one savior for Egypt,” he said in a three-hour TV interview shortly after he arrived. “My goal is for Egypt to save itself. Help me in order to help you. If you want this country to change, then every one of you must participate to show his desire.”
It is hard to say where ElBaradei’s headfirst plunge into Egyptian politics will lead. He has given voice to the frustration with Egypt’s political, social and economic stagnation in a way that had not been seen since a brief, measured political thaw in 2005. But his early support appears to be primarily among intellectuals and young people, and analysts have questioned whether he will be able to broaden that appeal.
RULING PARTY SHAKEN
If anything concrete has so far emerged from his challenge, political analysts said, it appears that the governing party may be shaken enough that Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak will consider running for president again when his term expires in 2011.
There had been widespread speculation that Mubarak, who is 81 and has governed for nearly 29 years, was grooming his younger son, Gamal, to be the candidate of the governing National Democratic Party. But the thinking now is that the younger Mubarak’s credentials could not match ElBaradei’s.
The signs that the elder Mubarak might be changing his mind: He has visited regions around the country recently and the state-run media have begun referencing his electoral platform.
“ElBaradei constitutes a real challenge,” said Mustapha Kamel El Sayed, a political science professor at American University in Cairo. “Not necessarily in terms of his capacity to win an election against the candidate of the National Democratic Party, but in terms of the superiority of his prestige and the respect he has domestically and internationally.”
UNIQUE CHALLENGE
In 2005, under pressure from Washington, the Egyptian government made some effort to improve political freedoms, and the next year it allowed challengers to run against the president in his bid for re-election. Previously the president had run in single candidate “referendums.”
Soon after, however, the political opening evaporated, and in 2007 the state pushed through amendments to the Constitution that effectively made it harder for independents to run for office.
ElBaradei has called on the state to change the Constitution again, a pragmatic first step since under existing law he is unlikely to qualify to run — a fact that he has used, subtly, to embarrass the state.
His decision to plunge into politics presents the government with a unique challenge. He is a former insider, a diplomat who once worked for the foreign service and who hails from the cadre of political elite now in charge.
“He is not a radical and he is not going to change the country’s direction 180 degrees,” said Amr El-Shobaki, a political analyst at the Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies in Cairo. “At the same time, he reveals their mismanagement, the absence of democracy, the arbitrariness of the regime.”
ElBaradei, 67, left his post in December as director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Along with the nuclear agency, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2005. In December, as speculation about ElBaradei’s possible candidacy surfaced, the state media began to attack him. But in the past few weeks, they have largely ignored him, even as he has received tremendous attention from independent media.
If there was any indication of how the governing party might challenge ElBaradei, it was in a front-page opinion piece written by Abdel Moneim Said, chairman of Al Ahram, which publishes the state-owned and widely circulated newspaper of the same name. His article effectively said that while ElBaradei called for change, his ideas were not new, and that many of his facts about the challenges Egypt faces were wrong.
Few expect that to be where the effort to block ElBaradei ends.
“The regime that controls this country is very smart and cunning and sly, and he who thinks otherwise is under an illusion and naive, or it wouldn’t have preserved such a large nation in the refrigerator of stillness and subservience for 30 years,” Magdy el Gallad wrote in the Feb. 23 issue of the independent daily newspaper al-Masry Al-Youm. “As such, it knows how to deal with each opponent or competitor or opposition in a special and different way.”
The only remaining question, Gallad said, was: “How then will the ruling regime burn Mohammed ElBaradei?”
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY MONA EL-NAGGAR
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with