It wasn’t difficult to find out how President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) spent his Lunar New Year holiday. Anyone who browsed news channels over the nine days could easily find Ma criss-crossing the nation, either busily campaigning for Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidates for Saturday’s legislative by-elections or giving away red envelopes containing chocolate gold coins to temple visitors — often with KMT candidates standing close by.
It was festive and appropriate seeing the president spread holiday cheer and send out New Year greetings, but it is disturbing to see him perform his public duty with obvious partisan colors, blurring his roles as president and KMT chairman.
As head of state, where Ma goes and what he does publicly is closely watched by the media. With that in mind, and in view of a slew of gloomy news ahead of and during the holidays, one can’t help but wonder if Ma couldn’t have better spent his time and energy on causes more worthy of public attention rather than concentrating on partisan interests.
According to research conducted by the Taiwan Fund for Children and Families, last year’s economic downturn and the disaster triggered by Typhoon Morakot resulted in an increase in the number of under-privileged families.
Shortly before the Lunar New Year holiday, the non-profit children’s welfare organization estimated that about 50,000 children across the country were likely to spend their holidays with empty stomachs as a result of severe poverty.
The latest information released by the Ministry of the Interior also showed that the number of households below the poverty line has climbed to a record 105,000.
That the figure has exceeded 100,000 households for two consecutive quarters suggests a growing gap between the nation’s rich and poor.
Meanwhile, media also reported another grim figure: Between Feb. 13 — Lunar New Year’s Eve — and last Friday, nine help centers in Taipei County received more than 1,000 calls on their suicide hotlines.
If Ma were to visit children from under-privileged families or the help centers, for example, wouldn’t that be more beneficial in drumming up media coverage of pressing issues than campaigning?
No one ever said being head of a state while doubling as a party chairman was easy. In the past, the KMT — including Ma — often accused then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of blurring the lines between the two roles. After making the same decision, Ma should be all the more careful in drawing a clear distinction between president and chairman in his public appearances if he has any intention of honoring his pledge to be a “people’s president” (全民總統).
On Monday, Ma said he didn’t deserve to be a president if he failed to actualize the goal of signing an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China, which he touts as the best way to create economic opportunities for Taiwanese.
Ma would certainly not deserve to be president if — as suggested by his public conduct and rhetoric over the holidays — he cares more about partisan interests than people’s well-being.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS