After some Taipei city councilors thought the Muzha-Neihu MRT line’s slew of mechanical problems might be linked to an unlucky name, the Taipei City Government spent about NT$1 million (US$31,200) in October on new maps and signs to rename the line the Wenshan-Neihu Line, which it said sounded more elegant and luckier.
Hopefully, no Taipei City Government officials really believed changing the name from Zhahu to Wenhu would put an end to the line’s breakdowns.
Given the spate of incidents since October, the problem-ridden line needs more than just some name changes to reverse the “bad luck” that has plagued it since it was launched last July.
The latest to the long list of malfunctions occurred during the morning rush hour on Monday. Service was interrupted for more than 30 minutes, affecting 19 trains and more than 1,700 passengers. The Taipei Rapid Transit Corp (TRTC) said an unexpected power interruption caused the problem.
The breakdown not only dampened what was left of Taipei residents’ confidence in the Wenhu line, but was a slap in the face for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who just last Wednesday stood by the decision he made when he was Taipei mayor to make the line a medium-capacity system.
Ma said the Wenhu line’s overall performance during its trial period had been much better than that of the original Muzha line.
“I am confident about the future of the Taipei MRT,” he told Control Yuan members probing alleged irregularities during the line’s construction, adding that he considered extending the MRT system to be “the proudest” achievement of his eight years as mayor.
Maybe Ma, or Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), would want to ask Taipei residents what they think of the line. Are they as proud of a line that cost the city government almost NT$70 billion to build?
The truth is the Wenhu line has experienced multiple breakdowns since its trial period. Aside from the regular malfunctions such as power outages, circuit-board issues and network glitches that have yet to be completely resolved, braking irregularities and reports of a scorched smell have also been reported.
Rather than letting a fluke determine the magnitude of an incident whenever a breakdown occurs and just blaming TRTC or its contractors for their ineptitude, it’s time for the Taipei City Government to take proactive measures.
Suspending the line temporarily might incur a wave of criticism, and worse, deal a blow to Ma and the city’s sense of pride. However, if the city government wants to prove it is a responsible administration that cares about its residents’ well-being, it should stop letting ego — or face — stand in the way of admitting faults and correcting wrongs.
The city must carry out a blanket inspection of the Wenhu Line and tackle all the issues, even if that means shutting down the line for a substantial period of time.
For the sake of passenger safety, it is better to be safe than sorry.
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
On Monday last week, American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Director Raymond Greene met with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers to discuss Taiwan-US defense cooperation, on the heels of a separate meeting the previous week with Minister of National Defense Minister Wellington Koo (顧立雄). Departing from the usual convention of not advertising interactions with senior national security officials, the AIT posted photos of both meetings on Facebook, seemingly putting the ruling and opposition parties on public notice to obtain bipartisan support for Taiwan’s defense budget and other initiatives. Over the past year, increasing Taiwan’s defense budget has been a sore spot
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
RSS