When former Czech president Vaclav Havel knocked on the door of the Chinese embassy in Prague to demand the release of writer Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波), I had an eerie sense of deja vu. Thirty-three years ago, Havel helped initiate Charter 77, the landmark document that crystallized the ideals of all the dissidents — and many others — trapped behind the Iron Curtain.
Havel, of course, was rewarded with a long jail sentence for his efforts. Now Liu has been sentenced to 11 years imprisonment for much the same crime — initiating Charter 08, perhaps the bravest attempt yet to chart a peaceful way to freedom for China.
History is said to repeat itself, first as tragedy, second as farce, and it is indeed farcical for China’s government to try to suppress the yearning for freedom in the same brutal ways that Soviet-era communists once did. Jailing Liu on the absurd charge of trying to overthrow the Chinese state is typical of the type of thinking found in the closed societies of 20th century communism, where the state asserted its absolute right to judge every thought and every thinker.
The progress of China’s economy over the past 30 years is something all Chinese celebrate, but the jailing of Liu also demonstrates in the starkest terms that China’s neglect of human rights is flowing to the rest of world alongside the mass of Chinese goods. Indeed, it is becoming increasingly clear that China opened its economy only to maintain the country’s over-mighty rulers in power, not to respect and enhance the lives of ordinary Chinese.
Although China’s government does not keep any of its international commitments on economic, social and cultural rights, the world’s democracies appear to have lost their willingness to stand up for their beliefs, as US President Barack Obama’s kowtow to China during his November visit painfully demonstrated. It was a refusal to buckle to the values of Nazism and Communism in the 20th century that ensured the success of freedom. Liberty today needs the same type of stalwart defense.
Yes, civilization seems to be on the defensive. Though many people seem to be in denial about this, politics has retreated to a renewal of the last century’s long struggle for democracy and freedom. China’s model of authoritarian capitalism appears triumphant, but there is nothing genuinely new about this model — like all dictatorships, it deprives people of political rights and freedom of speech. Chinese intellectuals face the cruelest reality — harsh suppression and a popular audience devoted to mammon and materialism.
The globalization of commercial interests, however, does retain some power to restrict Chinese authoritarianism if only the world’s democracies would seize it. Weak states, of course, tend to be cynical about China’s growing might. The problem is that the global economic crisis has led even advanced Western states to question the wisdom of allowing the political civilization of human rights to interfere with the quest to restore economic growth.
Democratic politicians must not surrender their consciences to woo either their own economically jittery citizens or the Chinese regime.
Havel captured this idea perfectly when he criticized Obama’s silence on human rights when he was in Beijing.
Fortunately, China’s jailing of Liu will not, as we Chinese say, succeed in its effort to frighten the monkey by killing a chicken. Liu is too invisible to ordinary Chinese for that to happen. No, the incarceration of Liu is targeted at those who value democracy, both within China and abroad. It is an effort to criminalize democratic ideas and force people to choose between those ideas and doing business with China.
China’s economy needs world markets as much as world markets need China. Moreover, the West’s inclination to appease China will gradually cause ordinary Chinese to lose confidence that economic modernization will ever set them free. So continued silence when poets, writers or lawyers are treated like criminals will only assure that China’s markets are eventually lost alongside freedom. A closed society will eventually return to a closed economy.
The real criminal in the Liu affair is, of course, the Chinese state — but those who think that China’s authoritarianism and mighty economy will prevail are guilty as well. Such a system is as unsuited to the future as Mao’s system was to the past.
Ma Jian is a novelist.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95