Greece is on the verge of bankruptcy, but what, you may ask, does that have to do with Taiwan?
A few months ago, Taiwan’s mainstream media were publishing anxious editorials and opinion pieces about how the nation was up to its ears in debt. Taiwan’s real national debt has reached NT$19 trillion (US$590 billion), and international ratings agencies have started cutting its credit ratings. Despite the seriousness of the situation, the government, and especially the Ministry of Finance, does not seem at all concerned.
How can the situation not be serious when each one of us bears a debt burden of NT$860,000 (US$27,000)? Once, when I was chatting about this with a colleague, he said: “However high the national debt may be, it won’t have any effect on ordinary people’s lives. Life will go on just as before.”
If people are so unconcerned, no wonder the media have stopped talking about it.
Germany is another country weighed down by debt. The German federal government responded to the financial and economic crisis by injecting relief funds of 1.6 trillion euro (US$2.28 trillion). This year alone, the country must pay 42 billion euro in interest — more than it spends on defense, education, science and culture combined. There is endless public debate about how to cope with such an enormous debt. Following last year’s general election, the Free Democratic Party, a minor party that favors making big tax cuts to stimulate investment and consumption, joined German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government as a coalition partner, intent on carrying out its campaign promises.
This idea has provoked a backlash from German society, from university professors to the man and woman on the street. Everyone is worried that tax cuts will only make the country’s financial situation worse. Germany’s national debt is four times Taiwan’s, but it must be seen in relation to GDP. While Germany’s GDP is US$3.7 trillion, Taiwan’s is less than US$400 billion. If Germans are tearing their hair out over their national debt, how can people in Taiwan not be worried?
The root cause of Taiwan’s national debt is that we are bad at increasing revenue and curbing expenditure. The government squanders money on the one hand and cuts taxes willy-nilly on the other. A good example of squandering money is the more than NT$200 billion paid out every year in pensions for retired military personnel, public servants and teachers. As the number of retirees grows, and with people living longer, this burden can only get heavier. A little more than a year ago, I had occasion to put this point to then-minister of education Cheng Jei-cheng (鄭瑞城).
Cheng answered frankly: “This is a serious problem, but it is not one that the Ministry of Education can solve.”
As the national debt keeps on growing, Taiwan’s credit rating is bound to keep on falling. Another result will, of course, be a big drop in the value of the NT dollar. When that happens, the government will have no choice but to make big cuts in public spending, and the result of that will be frequent protests, demonstrations and social unrest. Clearly, the national debt is going to have a very real influence on the lives of ordinary people.
Greece’s current predicament should serve as a warning. Its GDP is just a little less than that of Taiwan, but its national debt of 300 billion euro has the country gasping for breath. The problems mentioned above have already come into the open. The core problem in Greece is systemic corruption, especially in government. Falsification, cronyism and bribery are deeply rooted in Greek culture. Think about it, though — are Taiwanese any different?
Those who fail to foresee the future will have problems in the present. We should not make the mistake of thinking that the national debt will only bring grief to future generations. It is going to make the present generation suffer first.
Under the third-rate democracy we have in Taiwan, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government will of course keep papering over the cracks, putting the problem off until after he has been elected to a second term.
The worrying thing is this: while Greece has the EU and the IMF to back it up, whom will Taiwan look to when it reaches the verge of bankruptcy? Will we end up begging for money from China? It doesn’t matter which side of the political divide you stand on, that is a nightmare prospect for everyone in Taiwan.
Huang Juei-min is a law professor at Providence University.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to