What’s behind PRC aid?
The human and economic toll of the Jan. 12 earthquake off the coast of Haiti highlights the institutional weakness of many poor countries when faced with natural disasters.
With difficulty providing basic services before the earthquake and the destruction of many aid centers (including the UN mission headquarters), the need for immediate foreign assistance is undeniable. While the international response has been remarkable — mirroring that of the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake — another factor may have gone largely unnoticed: China’s offer of assistance.
Chinese offers of post-disaster assistance have become more commonplace in the past decade; however the Haitian case is anomalous in that the Caribbean country is one of the 23 countries with diplomatic relations with Taipei rather than Beijing. Although Chinese assistance has on occasion been granted to non-recognizing countries (such as sending peacekeepers to Haiti in 2004), this usually has been part of “dollar diplomacy” to encourage a switch of diplomatic recognition.
Haiti has been one of Taiwan’s strongest allies since it established relations in 1956, in no small part because Taiwan has been the island’s largest single donor in recent years. Current conditions, however, present an opportunity to tie much needed aid to cutting relations with Taiwan. While one should applaud China rising as a responsible global power, the potential political incentives behind these actions should not be ignored.
TIMOTHY RICH
Bloomington, Indiana
Look in the mirror, Mr Ma
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said recently that “former Democratic Progressive Party legislator [and candidate] Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) is not a Hualien person, only a passerby, and does not have feelings for Hualien.”
Ma was not very careful in choosing his words to criticize the candidate of the opposition party. He should have realized that the manner in which he criticized Hsiao essentially represented a criticism of himself and his party.
Ma’s criticism could easily be substituted with “President Ma is not a Taiwanese, only a passerby, and does not have feelings for Taiwan,” and “the Chinese Nationalist Party is not a local party, only a Chinese party, and does not have feelings for Taiwan.”
Taiwanese are the best judges as to whether these statements are true or false.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with