Stop global warming now
The unpredictable and incredible impact of climate change is appalling. Our planet is endangered. Burning oil and coal in an abusive manner are key causes of climate change. Moreover, the exploitation of natural resources by human beings has worsened the scenario, destroying the environment.
The Arctic and Antarctic ice caps are melting at an unimaginable speed and glaciers have been whittled down to mere ice blocks. If they continue to melt, sea levels will rise 6m in 20 years, with grave consequences for Taiwan.
In a BBC report last year about the Maldives, the head of conservation at a local resort said there would “be more tidal surges, more swells, and more storms” because of climate change.
“Tidal surges will not only increase the risk of houses and communities being flooded, but will also result in a higher level of salt water on local vegetation — which will impact on food production too,” the resort staffer said.
Because of climate change, a very bad future is waiting for us. Most pitifully, a large number of people could become homeless as a result of climate change.
The disasters happening around the world should teach us that we cannot ignore climate change.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has held conferences in the past few years on research concerning climate change.
It has also publicized the goals of the Kyoto Protocol to the whole world.
One IPCC report identifies 13 major cities worldwide that will be submerged by seawater in 20 years.
Although Taiwan is not a signatory of the Kyoto Protocol, along with countries like Bangladesh, it could be among the first to see parts of its population uprooted by rising sea levels.
Taiwan should be concerned about weather phenomena such as El Nino and its impact.
Beware of the Maya belief that the world will end in 2012. This is not alarmist — it is something for all humans to ponder.
After all, governments worldwide should undertake proactive measures to combat climate change — not just write out plans on paper. Actions speak louder than words.
MELODY WU
Jhonghe, Taipei County
Consumers want safe goods
Common sense tells us that no product or service will be rejected as long as it is deemed necessary and safe for consumption.
If my products or services were rejected, I would do some self-reflecting, after which I would determine to improve myself and move on rather than continuing to voice my deep regret.
The US will always have the potential to improve itself, and Taiwan will continue to do business with the US.
MICHAEL TSAI
Tainan
No more scaremongering
The development and implementation of the vaccination program against A(H1N1) influenza is a remarkable and most discouraging example of disorganization and unpreparedness.
The Centers for Disease Control may have thought it was doing everything in its power to protect the public, but it has left the job half done. The lack of scientific support for some of the side effects that have been reported and the failure to account for the more serious medical conditions and deaths that have occurred within days or weeks of receiving a vaccination have resulted in a circus of misinformation for which the public will suffer.
While it is true that the government has failed to respond adequately to the matter of side effects, the media are to blame for irresponsible reports on claims regarding side effects.
The media’s concentration on unsubstantiated reports is regrettable. Yet its insinuation is that in absence of medical proof, the severe side effects and deaths must have been caused by the vaccination.
The message is that this could happen to you or your child if you proceed with the vaccination. The media has scared the public to death without reason and has scared them into inaction.
The government was wrong — but the media’s culpability is much worse. It has told only half the story, spread fear without scientific grounds and almost completely stopped government efforts to halt the spread of swine flu.
PETER RYAN BRADY
Taipei
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS