On Dec. 10, International Human Rights Day, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) announced that two international human rights covenants — the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) — took effect in Taiwan, making them legally binding.
“By turning them into domestic legislation, we are joining countries where international covenants apply. This will tell the international community that although Taiwan is excluded from the UN, our willingness and determination to shoulder international duties are very clear.”
To 170,000 domestic foreign workers without a right to holidays, this is nonsense.
Article 7 of the ICESCR states that “Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to ... Rest, leisure and reasonable limitation of working hours.” Holidays and work hours are basic rights regardless of nationality and profession, yet in Taiwan, which has a five-day work week, 170,000 migrant domestic workers are excluded by the Labor Standards Act (勞動基本法), without the even the most fundamental right of one day off per week.
Because of serious shortcomings in the public welfare system, cheap foreign labor has become a necessity for many households with an urgent need for elderly care. Although the government has passed legislation to bring in cheap migrant domestic workers, it excludes them from the Labor Standards Act. This has led to the all-out privatization and commercialization of this sector.
Work hours, holidays, job description and conditions are unregulated and lack any guarantees, creating a situation where we can read tragic news reports about foreign workers working throughout the year without a single day off, becoming mentally unstable and killing their employers. Changes in government have done nothing to improve the situation.
The home has already become a work place through hiring maids and other workers. We would like domestic work to be made public — the state should shoulder responsibility for the needs of individual households and set basic labor regulations clearly defining the home as a work place. This is an important prerequisite to establishing a system for long-term care. Whether it consists of applying the Labor Standards Act to this sector or creating a domestic services law, it would mean recognizing the fact that domestic work is a job, with labor contracts and workplace accident risks. It is not a matter of “fishing for benefits” and it must not be blocked simply to keep costs low for employers. If economically disadvantaged employers cannot offer reasonable labor conditions, we should demand that the government invest in social welfare resources instead of increasing the pressure on caregivers.
People are not robots. Foreign domestic workers continue to struggle for the right to rest. This not only means a day of rest after a week of hard work, it also means holidays, the ability to leave the workplace and make friends, to update oneself about what is going on in the world, to seek assistance and to organize. The disadvantaged will never be handed a megaphone freely — it is only through collective action that they will ever be able to speak up. Foreign workers without holidays are deprived of the social conditions required to live as individuals.
A day after the human rights covenants took effect, thousands of migrant workers took to the streets to demand their rights. The government must move quickly to protect migrant workers lest it become clear that the two covenants were simply show.
Ku Yu-ling is chairwoman of the Taiwan International Workers’ Association.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing