Eric Horvitz illustrates the potential dilemmas of living with robots by telling the story of how he once got stuck in an elevator at Stanford Hospital with an android the size of a washing machine.
“I remembered thinking: ‘Whoa, this is scary,’ as it whirled around, almost knocking me down,” the Microsoft researcher recalled. “Then, I thought: ‘What if I were a patient?’ There could be big issues here.”
We’re still far from the sci-fi dream of having robots whirring about and catering to our every need, but little by little, we’ll be sharing more of our space with robots in the next decade, as prices drop and new technology creates specialized machines that clean up spilled milk or even provide comfort for an elderly parent.
Now scientists and legal academics are exploring the likely effects.
What happens if a robot crushes your foot, chases your cat off a ledge or smacks your baby?
While experts don’t expect a band of Terminators to attack or a 2001: A Space Odyssey computer that takes control, even simpler, benign robots will have legal, social and ethical consequences.
“As we rely more and more on automated systems, we have to think of the implications. It is part of being a responsible scientist,” Horvitz said.
Horvitz assembled a team of scientists this year when he was president of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence and asked them to explore the future of human-robot interactions. A report on their discussions is due next year.
For years, robots have been used outside the home. They detect bombs on the battleground, build cars in factories and deliver supplies and visit patients in hospitals, but the past few years have seen the rise of home robots. Mainly they are used for tasks like vacuuming (think Roomba). There are also robotic lawn mowers, duct cleaners, surveillance systems and alarm clocks. There are robotic toys for entertainment, such as Furby. Robotic companions, like Paro the harbor seal, comfort the elderly.
By 2015, personal robot sales in the US are expected to exceed US$5 billion, more than quadrupling what they are now, according to ABI Research, which analyzes technology trends.
“You won’t see Rosie from The Jetsons, but you’re going to see more and more robots that help maintain your home. They’ll pick up stuff off the floor, stock your fridge, carry stuff from the car,” said Colin Angle, chief executive of iRobot Corp, which makes the Roomba.
As such robots become more sophisticated, they could complicate questions about product liability. Ryan Calo, a fellow with Stanford’s Center for Internet and Society, said in a recent panel discussion at Stanford Law School that the original manufacturer might not always be liable if a robot went haywire.
“Robots are not just things the manufacturer builds and you go out and use them in a specific way. Robots can often be instructed, they can be programmed, you can have software that is built upon by others,” he said.
There are no laws in the US specifically governing robots and discussion of them usually leads to science fiction writer Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics, which debuted in his 1942 short story Runaround.
The first of Asimov’s laws is that robots should do no harm. It’s also one of the biggest considerations when manufacturing the next generation of personal robots.
“If a robot becomes increasingly autonomous and can make its own decisions, what happens if the robot does not carry out the exact wishes of the person?” said George Bekey, a robotics researcher and professor emeritus at the University of Southern California.
As robots interact more closely with people, the bonds some people form with the machines — even ones that do not look like humans — might need to be considered.
Shoppers personalize their Roombas, naming and decorating them, for example. Angle recalled an incident when a soldier plucked a banged-up military robot nicknamed Scooby from an Iraqi battlefield and carried it to a depot to be fixed.
“It’s doing you a service, you’re going to get attached to it,” Angle said.
Ronald Arkin teaches a course on robots and society at Georgia Tech and directs the school’s Mobile Robot Laboratory. His most recent book is titled Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots.
“There needs to be ethics embedded in the systems,” Arkin said. “It’s not just making a system that assists someone. It’s making a system that interacts with someone in a way that respects their dignity.”
Horvitz said his panel would recommend more research into the psychological reactions humans have to robotic systems. The group, he said, also suggests machines be designed with the ability to explain their reasoning to humans.
While ethicists, lawyers and roboticists ponder how to best integrate humans and autonomous machines, there is some evidence that a balance is already beginning to be struck.
After returning to visit the Stanford Hospital several years later, Horvitz noticed a sign hanging above the spot where he had his harrowing experience.
It read: “Please do not board the elevator with the robot.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with