Late Chinese leader Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) slogan “political power grows out of the barrel of a gun” remains the doctrine of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). To consolidate its one-party authoritarian rule, the CCP general-secretary serves concurrently as chairman of the Central Military Commission, keeping the party firmly in charge of the military and the government.
Chinese Major General Luo Yuan (羅援) is a researcher at the People’s Liberation Army Academy of Military Sciences. Speaking in Beijing recently, Luo publicly criticized President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) “three noes” policy as one of “peaceful separation.”
Such criticism was rather intriguing. Especially coming at a time when speculation is rife about changes in Taiwan-US relations after the meeting between Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and US President Barack Obama. Luo’s implied support for promoting unification through the threat of war is brazen.
At a cross-strait seminar titled “60 Years Across the Taiwan Strait” on Nov. 13 and Nov. 14 in Taipei, former CCP Central Party School vice president Zheng Bijian (鄭必堅) and other Chinese academics spoke hawkishly of “peaceful unification” and “one country, two systems.”
Only after the public reacted negatively did they change their tone, adding that what they had said did not necessarily represent Hu’s opinion or intentions. Zheng said he was only expressing his personal view.
Yet knowing the nature of the CCP, who would believe their denials? CCP hawks and doves may propose different means, but they have the same goal: forcing Taiwan to accept unification as soon as possible.
Military hawks, eager to rattle their sabers, want to grab the bull by the horns. As Luo says, if China wants to punish Taiwanese independence through military means, it has to prepare for war. But this approach would inevitably cause fresh problems in the Taiwan Strait and could be unfavorable to cross-strait negotiations and exchanges.
An article I wrote titled “Beijing sees Ma as supporting an independent Taiwan” said that the Young Turks of China’s military believe that Ma’s policies are “a needle wrapped in cotton.” This, because Ma may be able to win greater support from the international community by promoting an “independent Taiwan” rather than “Taiwan independence.”
Ma’s “three noes” policy — “no unification, no independence, no war” — are seen as the key elements of the so-called “independent Taiwan” course.
Those who subscribe to this view of Ma define “independent Taiwan” according to three criteria. First, shared sovereignty, which means that the governments on either side of the Taiwan Strait enjoy separate diplomatic space that does not overlap. Second, coexistence of entities, which means that each side has their own administrative jurisdictions, neither of which is subordinate to the other. Third is maintenance of the “status quo,” “mutual non-denial” and “one China, two interpretations,” under which Taipei says that there is “one China,” but that this “one China” is the Republic of China (ROC). Under such a framework, unification is just an option, not inevitable.
The “independent Taiwan” course came into existence based on the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) perceived interests at the time. It was also substantially influenced by the US’ Asia strategy and China policies. Clearly there are widely divergent views in China regarding Hu’s remarks in a six-point statement he made on New Year’s Eve that “everything is open to discussion.”
Today’s world is a global village. After last year’s financial crisis, countries need to work together to resolve their difficulties. Their priorities are to fix the economy and ensure people’s livelihoods. If any country starts a war against this backdrop, all nations and people stand to suffer.
If China were to do so, it would be universally condemned. In other words, for China to pursue unification by force is outdated and childish.
As former US deputy secretary of state Susan Shirk says, China’s leaders are aware that the vitality of Taiwan’s democracy is a result of its different social system and values. No single political party in Taiwan can decide everything. Rather, voters have the final say. Anyone who overlooks this fact will turn people in Taiwan against them. Such an attitude makes the two sides more suspicious of one another and can only make it more difficult to discuss a peaceful cross-strait framework.
Hu has said that he does not want to impose his will on the other side. Trying to understand each other and showing goodwill is much more profound and effective than trying to dominate the other side through military strength. Such a progressive approach is the only way forward, and the only way to ensure peace for future generations.
Lu I-ming is the former publisher and president of Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS