France, a nation endlessly fascinated with itself since at least as far back as the Gauls, is again engaged in a bizarre and deeply political debate over its identity.
Not for the first time, everything has been ordered from the top down, a project and campaign promise of French President Nicolas Sarkozy. A man of the center-right, whose popularity is dropping halfway through his five-year term, Sarkozy wanted to change the political debate about what it means to be French now, especially before important regional elections in March.
Having pulled a number of unhappy or disenchanted Socialists into his government, Sarkozy is facing serious unhappiness in his own party, the Union for a Popular Movement. So by raising issues of immigration, national identity and the Islamic veil, Sarkozy is trying to assuage his party’s concerns about a “globalized,” more racially and religiously diverse France, which can sometimes seem pretty far removed from Jean Racine, if not from the farces of Moliere.
Sarkozy is also trying, some analysts say, to pull in support from the far right, National Front supporters.
The man in charge of organizing the discussion is Eric Besson, 51, a former Socialist who is Sarkozy’s minister of immigration, integration, national identity and cooperative development. The Sarkozy-invented name for the ministry is telling enough; national identity, in the government’s mind at least, is connected to immigration and integration.
In an interview, however, Besson denied any connection between immigration and the debate.
Asked if it was a sign of anxiety or uncertainty about the current state of France, he said: “No, not at all. It’s neither out of worry nor out of naive optimism. It’s the idea that there is a pleasure in discussing.”
Asked how to judge any results or how they might be used, he had no answer, saying, “I believe in the virtue of the debate itself.”
Some on the right find the debate odd, including former prime minister Alain Juppe, who called it “pointless.”
Many on the left, including former presidential candidate Segolene Royal, think it is cynical.
“It’s a diversionary operation and an operation of conquest of a certain voting bloc before the regional elections,” she said, but then equivocated, adding: “But I believe this debate is a real debate. Where do we want to go together?”
The right, which champions assimilation, attacks the left for privileging cultural and ethnic differentiation. But Jean-Luc Melenchon, a European deputy of the Left Party, born in Tangier, Morocco, said with exasperation: “To be French is to have a French identity card. And the rights that go with it. Period.”
Prominent French Muslims have reacted with resentment.
“They can’t ask us to sing the Marseillaise when we’re young, then when we’re adults shut us out of positions of responsibility,” said Kamel Hamza, a local councilor for Sarkozy’s party.
Yazid Sabeg, an Algerian-born businessman who is Sarkozy’s commissioner for diversity and equal opportunity, was ambivalent at best, seeing the residues of colonialism and racism.
“The French nation is more united than one might think, the organic sense of being French does exist,” he wrote in the newspaper Le Monde.
But he warned of “sorcerer’s apprentices who are stirring up the threat of communitarianism,” saying: “Let’s stop linking questions of identity to the management of migrant flows while invoking the notion of integration, especially for populations already settled here for generations. One wonders into exactly what the visible minorities — French born in France to French parents — ought to integrate.”
Besson said even the left was engaged.
“If you look at just about all the politicians of the left who have expressed themselves to say the debate is unfortunate,” he said, “they all end up giving their own definition of the national identity, of values, etc. It’s perfect.”
He himself was born in Morocco, son of a Lebanese mother and a French father. Besson came to France at 17 and did well in business and politics, defecting in a major scandal from Royal’s campaign in 2007, then joining Sarkozy’s government.
Asked if the goal was to promote the integration of immigrants or traditional “Franco-French” values, Besson grew slightly upset.
“I absolutely do not see myself in your question, you’re asking me if I would prefer to kill my father or my mother,” he said. “’Franco-French,’ that doesn’t exist. There are no purebred French; there is no race.”
But there is “a shared set of values,” he said.
“There is a political construction: a people who decides to affirm its sovereignty, which kills its king and decides to give itself a form, which is the republic, and which further believes that a certain number of values it holds can be universal values,” Besson said.
“Liberty, equality, fraternity. Secularism. Many populations have difficulty understanding how deeply secularism is one of the keystones of the French worldview,” he said.
But in the end, Besson justified the debate as following orders.
“It was a campaign promise of the president of the republic,” he said. “It’s a debate he asked me to organize as soon as I got here” in January.
The debate can be followed, after a fashion, on debatidentitenationale.fr, the official Web site.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under