The Republican Party emerged victorious from this month’s gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey. The way the party stuck firmly by its fundamental ideology and the confidence it showed in winning the elections offer important lessons for the pan-green camp ahead of next month’s mayoral and commissioner elections.
First, a party must have confidence that it can win an election. Like President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), US President Barack Obama was also elected with a significant margin of votes last year. The momentum gave the Democratic Party a majority in both the Senate and the House of Representatives.
Despite these upsets, the Republican Party did not despair or give up hope. Instead, it remained confident that it could win gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey and other local elections.
Ahead of the elections, Rush Limbaugh, the conservative host of the US’ most popular radio show, said with confidence that the Republicans would win in the two states.
The color of the Democratic Party is blue and we could therefore say that it is the “blue camp” of the US. For eight years, Virginia had been in the hands of the blue camp, while New Jersey was even more of a deep-blue stronghold, much like Taitung County.
The conservative media is one reason the Republicans were able to take deep-blue territory. Since Obama’s election, the right-wing media has kept up strong attacks against him, led by Limbaugh and Fox Broadcasting. They not only criticize Obama but show no mercy in their criticism of “compromisers” within the Republican Party.
Limbaugh and Fox’s Glenn Beck not only attack compromisers within the Republican Party — represented by Senator John McCain, a former presidential candidate — but also strongly criticize any weakness shown by the newly elected party chairman, Michael Steele.
Their efforts attracted a significant group of voters with clear ideals to the party. By the second half of this year, the right wing had managed to build up high morale and self-confidence both through the media and in different localities.
These were the two main factors behind the Republicans’ victory in the two gubernatorial elections.
The second lesson that the pan-green camp can learn from the Republicans’ victory is even more important. After losing the presidential elections last year, the Republicans did not compromise in the face of the Obama government’s policies or take a middle-of-the-road approach. Instead, they emphasized the party’s basic ideology and took a strong stand against the Obama administration’s interference in economic policy and what they called the “socialist” development toward universal medical insurance, while upholding republican ideals of small government and the free market.
During last year’s presidential election, McCain took the middle path and lost miserably. In the gubernatorial elections, none of the Republican candidates asked McCain to stump for them because he is a sure-fire way to lose votes.
In addition, Limbaugh and former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, another staunch conservative, proved to be the strongest agitators helping the Republican Party win the gubernatorial polls.
The pan-green camp is facing a problem in terms of which ideology to employ in the year-end local elections. It is unclear what the camp’s ideology is.
Although the elections will deal with some local issues, as in the US, political ideology comprises most of the debate.
The pan-green camp must discard its unclear, middle-of-the-road policies and clearly distance itself from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on China policy, Taiwan’s status and its future.
It must make its position on Taiwan’s sovereignty clear and launch a strong attack against the Ma administration’s pro-China and pro-Chinese Communist Party policies. It should have the courage to use slogans like “Say no to unification, protect Taiwan” and to employ these ideals to build consensus and improve its public image. At the same time, it must avoid empty slogans like “Show concern for disadvantaged groups” and “Work hard for your constituents.”
If Taiwanese lose Taiwan, their own free home, they will end up slaves — just like the Chinese. Only by promoting the ideal that the public is the master of the country will the pan-green camp stand a chance of winning the year-end elections.
Cao Changqing is a writer based in the US.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under