Mon, Nov 16, 2009 page8

• [ LETTERS ]

  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Improving ‘competitiveness’

  I’d like to offer some observations on President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) announcement concerning university classes taught in English (“Ma calls for more university classes taught in English,” Nov. 8, page 3).

  “If we refuse to make changes, great teachers and students will be gone and it will be more difficult for us to raise competitiveness,” Ma was quoted as saying.

  This fragment is ambiguous. In what sense did Ma mean “competitiveness” — in relation to the economy or to Taiwan’s universities versus universities in other countries?

  Unfortunately, the article does not clarify this. If Ma intended it in the former sense rather than the latter, then that is substantially different. However, I suppose it would strike most people as obvious that more competitive universities would improve general economic competitiveness.

  Yet there is overwhelming evidence that this is simply not true. Two months ago, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, in China, reported that graduates from Chinese universities were earning salaries equal to or in many cases lower than those of migrant field workers from Southeast Asia.

  The situation in Taiwan is not vastly different. How does it raise economic competitiveness for a young person to spend large sums of their parents’ money (often financed by debt) and four crucial years of their young lives only to graduate and work at a deli counter or a KFC?

  This is lunacy.

  Earlier in the article, Ma is quoted as saying: “Higher education in Taiwan should not keep its doors closed any more.”

  Might I suggest that Taiwan do precisely the opposite? It is high time that many universities and technical colleges were deprived of state funding. This would not only result in the closure of many smaller, less prestigious universities, but, perhaps more importantly, force the government to repeal or relax laws and regulations that stand in the way of entrepreneurial start-ups.

  The best way to raise economic competitiveness is to allow young people to learn to compete economically. The traditional Chinese attitude of revering education, along with disproportionate state support for education, is destroying the potential for many young people to create and sustain their own lives.

  Michael Fagan

  Tainan

  Nazi camps weren’t ‘Polish’

  I was shocked to read your photo caption describing a survivor of a “Polish concentration camp” (“Auschwitz survivor speaks against hazards of hatred,” Nov. 11, page 4).

  There were no Polish concentration camps — only German ones. This is a complete mix-up of victims and aggressors.

  Polish nationals were killed just like Jews in numerous German concentration camps during World War II. Polish citizens regardless of ethnic background were victims of barbaric German and Soviet acts.

  It’s completely unacceptable and insensitive to make this kind of mistake. The infamous Auschwitz concentration camp was built by the German government and run by the German military from beginning to end.

  I have much higher expectations of the Taipei Times, in particular when touching on issues related to history or human rights. I think most Taiwanese would feel outraged if an international media outlet made a mistake like this regarding Taiwan’s history.

  
  

  TOMASZ SWATOWSKI
  

  Taipei
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Chinese technicians join airport MRT project

  • 2

    A train for whom? Is a new monorail helpful for Cairo?

  • 3

    Apple is giving Intel’s turnaround some momentum

  • 4

    Uncrewed US craft transits the Taiwan Strait

  • 5

    Taiwan firms eye Philippines amid shift to non-China supply chains: CIER