Internet interrupted
With your article on Chunghwa Telecom’s plans to boost spending on infrastructure and raise Internet speeds (“Chunghwa to increase spending,” Nov. 2, page 12), I didn’t know if I should laugh or cry.
When I switched to their “Fiber to Building” service last year, my Internet connection speed more than doubled. But two months ago Chunghwa Telecom starting choking my Internet speed, perhaps because I use it at maximum constantly. But that’s exactly why I pay for higher speeds.
Local Hinet techies were polite and gave me transparently ludicrous explanations, but independent tests show my bandwidth is being throttled by external “packet queuing” and only Chunghwa Telecom could be the source.
Is net neutrality violation legal in Taiwan? Is it time for a public debate, especially since there is one monopoly provider here, Chunghwa, with all other services being mere resellers?
How many other of your readers are experiencing the same thing?
JOHN HANNA
Taoyuan City
Obama’s challenge
The news that US President Barack Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize has become a topic of continuous debate. When the news hit the press, some people questioned whether Obama deserved the prize.
In view of the fact that Obama has been traveling globally to promote peace and international cooperation, there should be no doubt that he will eventually fulfill the “dream” that the Nobel Peace Prize committee expects of him.
After rereading the Taipei Times report on his award (“Obama wins peace prize to mixed reviews,” Oct. 10, page 1), I realize that the reason why Obama won the prize was “his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international peace campaign and cooperation between peoples.”
This effort was manifested in Obama’s inauguration speech. Other speeches have also made the point. A quote from his speech at Cairo University on June 4: “To the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect.” This shows Obama hopes to find a peaceful way of creating a win-win situation globally.
Obama has been working to achieve global peace and nuclear nonproliferation. The Nobel committee obviously hopes that he can accomplish these goals. This global vision is compatible with the guidelines of the Nobel Peace Prize. Winning the prize is only the beginning for Obama. He has a long way to go and many problems to solve. We can look forward to the day that Obama fulfills what he has promised.
Obama should take the prize as an encouragement to commit himself further to the promotion of global peace. He will have to prove the fact that the American people selected a working president they are proud of.
STEVEN CHANG
Sanchong City, Taipei County
Quibbling over beef
The general fear concerning beef imported from the US seems to be bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) or “mad cow disease.” The director of the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) in Taipei said there have not been any cases of BSE recorded among US cattle since 1997, in a cattle population nearly 10 million strong. So, it is pretty safe to say we shouldn’t be overly worried about BSE in US beef.
What we should absolutely be concerned about is the level of growth hormones given to cattle, which leaves hormone residue in meat from hormone-treated cattle up to 20-fold higher than in hormone-free meat. These dangerously high levels of hormones greatly increase the risk of cancer. It is well documented that women in the US have about a five-fold greater risk of breast cancer than women from countries where hormone-free meat is consumed.
The EU and the US agreed in May to maintain the ban on hormone-treated beef and to permit hormone-free beef once again into the EU without duty. Why is our government not acting like other developed and advanced countries by looking at the real threat and dangers in US beef?
Should we be concerned about the extremely unlikely chance of contracting BSE or the irrefutably confirmed risks associated with daily doses of hormones?
Don’t we get enough chemicals, pesticides, herbicides and other toxins from seafood harvested from the heavily polluted waters around this gorgeous island? Do we also need to import hormone-treated beef and chicken from the US and quite likely China?
No meat of any animal treated with hormones from any country should be allowed into Taiwan.
DAN LUTHI
Taichung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with