The members of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) newly elected power center, the Central Standing Committee, resigned en masse at their first meeting, forcing a re-election. This is unprecedented in the century-long history of the KMT. Although it highlights the fact that the corruption that lies at the heart of the KMT has not disappeared, we will have to wait and see if this is the event that finally prompt party reform.
Every KMT election, from the central committee to the central standing committee, has resulted in accusations of vote-buying. In the past, the party always said that all such allegations would be thoroughly investigated and always found that no irregularities had been detected.
The latest elections were business as usual: campaigning, handshakes and small gifts, including everything from soy sauce, salted fish and red wine to deep cleansing face masks and orchids. Strictly speaking, these gifts have limited value compared with the expensive foreign spirits and gold pens of the party-government era, but it was educational to hear candidates pay lip service to President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) call for ethical reform while giving gifts and soliciting votes behind his back.
Following a wave of sarcasm and criticism, Ma ordered an exhaustive investigation. The dutiful expulsions of two committee members were met with ridicule in the party. Some said the two unlucky were picked simply because they were easy targets, while others wondered what would happen to the year-end elections if the investigations were allowed to proceed. Ma said the investigation must be exhaustive and that anyone found guilty would have to step down. Those close to Ma who are more attuned to the direction the wind is blowing hurried to a news conference, where they called for new elections. Ma welcomed the call.
Party headquarters immediately hinted that all members should resign and within a day, more than 20 newly elected members had done so, thus forcing a re-election.
Still, this isn’t enough to solve the KMT’s problems. The division between party and government has yet to be defined and the party’s core values remain unclear, giving rise to different political aspirations. Some hold the parochial view that the party should direct the government and feel that investing in a campaign is worthwhile because the committee can influence government policy. Others think the party should assist the government, and although a place on the central standing committee may not allow them much influence over government policy, it will impress Chinese officials into giving them preferential treatment, which makes the investment worthwhile.
If, however, the party were reduced to an electoral machine, few people would be interested in running for the central standing committee.
While, the KMT must hold a new election, Ma must first define the party’s, the Cabinet’s and the legislature’s role and relationship, and the party’s political ideals and regulations, so that those considering a candidacy know what they are getting into, so that those interested in power and money alone can back out. Only then could the KMT restore its slogan from a hundred years ago: “sharing ideals and beliefs.”
If Ma is unwilling to clarify these things and recognize the central standing committee election directed by his predecessor, Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄), and if the re-elections exclude other forces, the party will be enveloped in rumors of political conspiracy. If that happens, even with a reshuffled central standing committee, the KMT’s future will be a gloomy one.
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
In 1935, the German Reich led by the National Socialist Party officially created the Nuremberg Race Laws, a “legal cage”, for German Jews, stripping them of citizenship, criminalizing their personal relationships, barring them from public life, and transforming them into stateless subjects and isolating them from the rest of society. Similarly, in March 2026, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) National People’s Congress adopted the “Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress” law, which represents the most significant shift in Chinese domestic governance since the era of Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Ostensibly designed as domestic legislation to manage China’s 56 officially recognized ethnic groups,
RSS