Sometimes it’s hard to tell whether this government is serious about reducing Taiwan’s shamefully high level of carbon dioxide emissions.
When President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) came to power almost 18 months ago, he made a lot of noise about the environment and the need to reduce carbon dioxide emissions — which in 2005 saw Taiwan ranked 22nd in the world.
Since then we have seen only grudging progress on the environmental front.
Admittedly, the government has set a national goal of cutting carbon emissions to 2000 levels by 2025, but it has yet to show it has the capacity or will to achieve this.
Another problem is that 2000’s emissions levels are way above the kind of levels that Taiwan should be achieving if it is to help avert dangerous climate change. Much more drastic cuts are required.
It took threats from a foreign company to pull out of the local market before the legislature managed to pass the long-delayed renewable energy act in June.
Then this week the Cabinet’s Tax Reform Committee finally looked as if it were moving things in the right direction with a proposal to introduce an incremental tax on energy sources and greenhouse gas emissions that would see the price of gasoline almost double within 10 years.
The government, however, immediately backtracked on the proposal after the predictable disapproving noises from politicians, industry and the public.
Taiwan must drastically cut its carbon-dioxide emissions, but Ma has missed the boat. A year ago, when his political capital was sky high, he could have gotten away with it, but now, with his popularity at rock bottom, any move to begin this levy in 2011 would be the final nail in his 2012 electoral coffin.
While the idea is fine in principle — electricity, gasoline and other emission-creating commodities have long been undervalued in this nation, leading to profligacy on a grand scale — such drastic measures need to be implemented by a government much earlier in its term to give the electorate time to get used to it.
It would be political suicide for any government to introduce such reforms during the second half of its term, a fact that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — not the civil servants who proposed the policy — needs to take into account.
Nevertheless, addressing such a monumental calamity as global warming will call for tough decisions and leaders may have to throw caution to the wind. This is something Ma and all those world leaders who will attend December’s Copenhagen climate conference need to bear in mind.
Studies such as the British government’s Stern Report in 2006 have shown that the economic cost of acting to prevent climate change now will be far lower than the cost of dealing with its consequences.
Continued GDP growth is all well and good, but has this government considered how Taiwan will cope if in a few decades large tracts of the heavily populated western plains are inundated by rising sea levels?
To solve this looming catastrophe, governments around the world, including Taiwan, need to take a long-term view of the problem and begin serious mitigation efforts now.
Worrying about short-term, selfish political considerations is no longer an option.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs