As many people expected, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) received a heavy sentence — life in jail — after being found guilty in a graft case against him. After receiving the sentence, Chen’s appeal to be released from detention was, like many also expected, unsuccessful, and he remains in detention.
To no one’s surprise, pan-blue media commentators applauded the decisions and continued hurling attacks at the “corrupt family.” While anti-corruption efforts should be acknowledged and supported, it is very hard to understand how “anti-corruption” has taken precedence over the principles of having competent judges, due process and basic human rights, such as a fair defense for the accused and the presumption of innocence.
How can our legal system deal with Chen’s NT$700 million (US$21.7 million) in assets while ignoring those of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), whose value is in the tens of billions of NT dollars?
Taiwan’s situation is very similar to that referred to by Carl Schurz in a speech titled “Liberty and Equal Rights” when he was running in a Massachusetts senatorial campaign in 1859: “Do not indulge in the delusion that in order to make a government fair and liberal, the only thing necessary is to make it elective,” Schurz said, because “the ruling party, which has devoted itself to the service of that despotic interest, shrinks from no violation of good faith, from no adulteration of the constitutional compact, from no encroachment upon natural right, from no treacherous abandonment of fundamental principles.
“When a political party in power, however liberal their principles may be, have once adopted the policy of knocking down their opponents instead of voting them down, there is an end of justice and equal rights,” he said.
This was how the US was back in the 19th century. The KMT and its followers, who have been influenced by some of the darker sides of traditional Chinese culture, seek to accomplish their goals by any means — through unscrupulousness, deceit and false allegations, weeding out those with different opinions while being dishonest. They are as vicious and calculating, if not worse than, the people Schurz referred to.
History has taught us that power needs to be kept in check. The same goes for the judiciary.
Therefore, if we no longer cherish the right to vote and use our votes to execute effective checks on those in power, in the near future Taiwan could very well become a country that is no longer based on democracy, the rule of law and human rights.
Since the Chen case began, we have seen that all kinds of actions that are non-democratic and against the rule of law and human rights can be justified under the guise of “fighting corruption.”
Chen Chun-kai is a professor of history at Fu Jen Catholic University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS