The devastating 921 Earthquake 10 years ago, as well as environmental disasters that have hit the nation since, must be understood as a warning sign not only from the perspective of disaster management, but also for the unique threat it poses to Taiwan’s unofficial, yet undeniable, world heritage status.
The 921 Earthquake caused heavy fatalities and losses. Most could have been prevented if a disaster management system had existed. But since disasters don’t fit a modern thriving society’s inclination for pleasure and neglect, prevention and handling of disasters will remain an isolated activity that stands against the comprehensive understanding of nature and man’s conflicting economic activity.
The article “Tectonic activity on the rise” published in your paper on Sept. 22 addressed recent findings on the Great Chi-Chi earthquake. On Sept. 21, 1999, the deadly waves spread from an epicenter 10km northwest of Sun Moon Lake, with titanic forces released within minutes. They brought down some 30 million tonnes of sandstone layers, creating a desert-like crater next to a new landmark, the Chiufen-Ershan peaks. Villagers from the 22 now-extinct mountain hamlets of Changshi (part of Nankang village in Kuohsing Township [國姓], Nantou County) who avoided being buried alive were not spared the trauma of their experience. In their minds, they still repeat the scenes of the “explosion” and the strange visions they experienced — “the roaring lion and furious dragon fuming through underground caves crumbling the mountains with its tail.”
Understanding of the natural world should be made compulsory in Taiwan to increase awareness on its sensitive environment. The principal reason for this is that Taiwan “suffers” from daily seismic tremors, most of them unnoticed, but all attributing to the rugged relief. Those tremors are the result not of a simple convergent boundary between earth crust plates, but of two active subduction zones forcing the tobacco-leaf shaped island to turn counter-clockwise.
Throughout Taiwan’s geologic history, horizontal and vertical displacements have structured the topography, which has come under intense study in the past decade.
Nonetheless, unlike in China, a thousand-year old earthquake observation unfortunately is not possible for Taiwan. Only incidental outcrops of paleogeographic displacements throw a light on the emergence, folding and faulting of the present mountain range. Its strongly continent-originating metamorphized rock has been upthrusted since the times of dinosaurs (between 100 million and 200 million years ago) by the eastward moving continental Eurasian plate beneath the Pacific (Philippine) plate west of the Hengchun Peninsula.
The oceanic plate subducts northward under that continental plate off the northeast coast, marked by the volcanic arc of Ryukyu Islands.
Our understanding of earthquakes has become increasingly accurate over the past century, from the devastating Kagi (Chiayi/Meishan) earthquake of 1906, with its 1,258 fatalities and 2,385 wounded, the Hsinchu-Taichung earthquake in 1935, with 3,276 dead and 12,053 injured and 54,688 buildings destroyed, the Chungpu quake in 1941, the Tainan quake in 1947, the Taitung quake in 1951 and the Paiho quake in 1964.
The intervals between those strong temblors were short, but irregular (6, 11, 16, 29 years) with epicenters concentrated around a mountain range.
No one had ever expected there could be an epicenter in the middle of Taiwan, or suspected the existence of any significant upthrust of the main faultline along the western mountain border. And yet it happened with the Chelungpo fault, which some scientists predict would move again only in 400 years.
Since tectonic activity can be registered only after it has engendered observable changes or caused damage, such predictions are vague and hence unaccountable. Indeed, tectonic activity in Taiwan is not “on the rise,” but remains based on the slow movement of Earth’s crust.
However, the release of accumulated energy is abrupt, and still unpredictable both in terms of time and location. With the 921 Earthquake the Chelunpu fault stole the show from Taiwan’s better-known faultline, which is embedded in the Hualien-Taitung rift valley. This hazardous zone separates Taiwan’s high-mountain continental section from its Pacific-born volcanic coastal range.
To get a feeling of Taiwan’s geological environment, one might want to turn to Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) fortuneteller, who reportedly went blind after warning the dictator not to build his Republic of China capital along the Chelungpo faultline.
Now this blindness seems to be affecting the entire country.
Earthquakes are like car accidents; although with inverse correlation, they depend on a number of calculable, though not foreseeable factors. An abrupt motion of rock entails a sudden increase of movement along tangent levels. In both cases human parameters determine the catastrophe.
As earthquake warning systems would fail anyway, a review of the short-sighted cost-benefit of prestige projects could help with the creation of an integrated environmental protection and disaster prevention mechanism. We must rethink such projects as the Taipei 101 skyscraper, which stands next to a main faultline at the edge of a soft basin, and the Hsuehshan tunnel, which involves drilling through heavily faulted rock layers.
If the 921 Earthquake is seen as a warning sign, action is needed for the sake of Taiwan, a unique world heritage for present and future generations.
Engelbert Altenburger is an associate professor in the Department of International Business at I-Shou University.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with