Airbus knew since at least 2002 about problems with the type of speed sensor that malfunctioned on an Air France passenger plane that went down in June, The Associated Press (AP) has learned. But air safety authorities did not order their replacement until after the crash, which killed all 228 people aboard.
The tubes, about the size of an adult hand and fitted to the underbelly of a plane, are vulnerable to blockage from water and icing. Experts have suggested that Flight 447’s sensors, made by French company Thales SA, may have iced over and sent false speed information to the computers as the plane ran into a thunderstorm at about 10,600m.
The exact role the sensors — known as Pitots — played in the crash may never be known without the flight recorders, which have not been recovered and which have stopped emitting signals.
Investigators insist sensor malfunction was not the cause of the crash, but many pilots think false speed readings may have triggered a chain of events that doomed the plane.
Fernando Alonso, head of Flight Operations at Airbus, maintains the doomed Airbus A330 plane was “totally airworthy.”
“There is no question for me the safety, the reliability of the airplane nor of the maintenance and operation procedures used by our operators,” he said.
The plane was flying from Rio de Janeiro back to the French capital when it went down in a remote area of the Atlantic, 1,500km off Brazil’s mainland and far from radar coverage. Automatic messages transmitted by the plane show its computer systems no longer knew its speed, and the automatic pilot and thrust functions were turned off.
Several European airline pilots, including former Air France captain Gerard Feldzer, believe a reading of the messages suggests Air France pilots were suddenly forced to take manual control in near impossible conditions: a cockpit ringing with warning bells and flashing lights, some of them contradictory, with few clues to speed, altitude and nighttime weather conditions.
“It’s very difficult when you are already experiencing turbulence in the middle of the night to know what to do,” said Feldzer, adding that the plane’s automated warning system could have been issuing incorrect instructions. “It’s very difficult to resist what you are being ordered to do because they are false orders.”
Air France is now starting a training program for pilots on how to manage a Pitot malfunction at high altitudes of the type experienced on Flight 447. Previously, Air France had only offered simulator training for Pitot malfunction on take-off and landing.
ANGRY
Pilots are angry about what they see as an attempt to pin the crash on pilot error. Eric Tahon, an Air France pilot, defended the role of the Flight 447 crew.
“We are trained to deal with multiple failures of the plane,” he said. “We are convinced that without the breakdown of the Pitots, Air France 447 that day would have set down at Roissy [airport in Paris].”
Feldzer, however, said that while the dangers now appear to have been underestimated, he believes Airbus and Air France would not have risked their reputations had they thought Pitot faults were critical.
A series of industry documents verified by investigators show that regular warnings on Airbus Pitots popped up as far back as 1994, although for a different model that was later banned in 2001 by French aviation officials.
An Airbus memo from July 2002 warns of blocked drainage holes on the Thales AA Pitot — the type fitted onto the doomed Air France jet — and says “this issue can affect all Airbus aircraft fitted with Thales Pitot probes.”
Airbus recommended replacing Thales Pitots with a newer model in 2007 but did not make the change mandatory. Air France decided to replace Pitots on its longer range Airbus fleet only when they broke down.
Air France says it started having problems with speed-measuring equipment on long-range Air France A330 and A340 jets in May last year, which Airbus blamed on ice crystals blocking Pitot tubes. But functioning sensors were not replaced at that stage.
Paul-Louis Arslanian, head of BEA, the French agency investigating the crash, said the body knew of around seven Pitot incidents on long-range planes of the A330-A340 family before the crash, and that Airbus knew of around 20.
Europe’s air safety authorities say they had been monitoring Thales Pitots on A330-340 long-range planes since last year, when it was aware of nine malfunction incidents.
Michael Barr, who teaches aviation safety at the University of Southern California, said it appears Airbus recognized the Pitot problem needed to be fixed but did not make it an urgent priority.
“What they hoped for was that the perfect storm wouldn’t come up before they got it fixed,” Barr said. “They were in the process of doing that when this one hit that perfect storm over the ocean.”
COST
The cost of replacing all Pitots on a worldwide fleet of planes is hardly major: For Air France, a full speed-sensor overhaul on its A330-A340 fleet would cost around 153,000 euros (US$222,000), according to AP calculations based on pilot estimates.
Both Thales and Goodrich declined to disclose the cost of their sensors.
But if prosecutors rule that the crash could have been avoided, the financial penalties and loss of reputation for Air France and especially Airbus, whose aircraft fill the skies every day, would be devastating.
There is no hard evidence that faulty Pitots caused the Air France crash, and in past reported incidents of Pitot malfunction, pilots have been able to regain control of the plane. Furthermore, what looks to be a likely cause in the beginning of a crash investigation sometimes shifts after investigators get more information from the flight recorders.
However, more than two months after the crash, the European Aviation Safety Agency has reassessed the dangers of faulty Pitots, ordering a continent-wide ban on the types of Thales sensors that were fitted onto Flight 447 on all long-range planes.
Barr said serious efforts to correct safety problems in the airline industry tend to increase in direct proportion to the number of people killed, while too little action is often taken in response to incidents in which no one is killed.
It even has a name: blood priority.
“The more blood that is spilled, the more corrective action is taken. The less blood that is spilled, the less corrective action that’s taken,” Barr said.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily