Ethnocentrism can backfire
Recent ethnic riots in Xinjiang and Tibet are a direct consequence of a Han-centric mentality and jingoistic patriotism, which no doubt adds fuel to the fire. As Samuel Johnson once said: “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.” I am not necessarily condemning patriotism — waving flags and shouting slogans to boost adrenaline levels in demonstrations or on the battlefield. Nor do I condone such irrational behavior as suicide bombers or kamikaze-like tactics.
However, we must ask ourselves why China has had problems with its neighbors, whether it is Tibet, Xinjiang, Myanmar, Vietnam, Taiwan, South Korea, Mongolia or Russia. Furthermore, Chinese living or traveling abroad are quite rowdy and disrespectful of local cultures in public places. I saw enough of them in the US. Though the virtue of hardworking Chinese cannot be denied in Southeast Asia, some of their unfair business practices have led to resentment toward them.
Of course it is also unfair to lay blame on the Chinese only, but a better assimilation would have been more constructive for both Chinese and locals.
To maintain stability, the Chinese must treat their neighbors as equals and respect their cultures even if they view some of them as antiquated and impractical. Minorities should not be viewed as hicks from the backwaters or barbarians; they should be treated with dignity. It seems a better solution to the conundrum in Xinjiang and Tibet is entirely plausible: Offer large-scale preferential treatment to the disadvantaged locals; tolerate and coexist with different cultures and religions.
No amount of ammunition, tanks and Han-superiority mentality can pacify the troubled regions in the long haul. Diversity, not adversity, is the key.
YANG CHIN-WEI
Chiayi
The name game
English-language newspapers in Japan have for many years been writing the names of Japanese people following the Western style: given name, surname. In addition, many Japanese businessmen and politicians have English name cards that follow the same Western style. I feel that it is time for Taiwan for start following this trend.
Instead of writing President “Ma Ying-jeou” (馬英九) in the English-language newspapers here in and in New York and London, let’s start writing his name as “Ying-jeou Ma.” As for former presidents, let’s refer to them as “Teng-hui Lee” (李登輝) and “Shui-bian Chen” (陳水扁). After all, the English-language newspapers in Taiwan call Japanese politicians by their first and then last names —“Junichiro Koizumi” and “Yukio Hatoyama” — for example, and those names are well-known in the West.
There’s another reason I suggest writing Taiwanese names in English news stories in the Western style: This style will help differentiate Taiwan from China, and readers in the West will come to understand that “Ying-jeou Ma” must be from Taiwan, since he uses the new system of naming, while Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) must be from China, since he uses the old system.
There is already a small difference between the way names are written in English in China and Taiwan: Notice that it’s “Ma Ying-jeou” with a hyphen between “Ying” and “jeou,” while Chinese do not usually include hyphens when Romanizing their names.
This way, foreigners understand that Hu Jintao is from China, while Ma Ying-jeou (or in the new system “Ying-jeou Ma”) is from Taiwan.
DAN BLOOM
Chiayi
Don’t fear the Dalai Lama
Unfortunately, we had Typhoon Morakot. Fortunately, we then had a visit by the Dalai Lama. Morakot and the Dalai Lama are two forces that have come together so dramatically this year.
While we feel very sorry for the 700 or so victims of Morakot, the Dalai Lama stands not only for spiritual consolation, but also for freedom and democracy. Yes, the Dalai Lama came to boost freedom and democracy in Taiwan while Ma’s administration only cares about the economic ties with China.
Who is afraid of the Dalai Lama if one loves freedom and democracy? The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has transformed the whole of China into one large prison. Of course, the Dalai Lama is hated by the CCP. While the CCP hopes the Dalai Lama will be silenced forever, we Taiwanese would love for him to visit again.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is afraid of the Dalai Lama because it sides with the CCP. This time people power won out and the Dalai Lama was able to visit.
The impact and influence of the Dalai Lama will continue because his presence in Taiwan inspires the Taiwanese and people in many other countries.
What Taiwan needs is not only weapons against any military threat but also the spiritual power to be fearless and to abide by dreams of freedom and democracy. This is the essential meaning of the Dalai Lama’s visit. He had the heart to come; we should have the courage to welcome and thank him.
NI KUO-JUNG
Hsinchu
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS