Given a choice between their world view and the facts, it’s always interesting how many people toss the facts. Right now, the US is plagued by an army of “birthers” who claim that because Barack Obama was not really born in America, he’s not legitimately president. Their evidence is non-existent, their arguments loopy, but people who find their non-white president unacceptable would rather scour the Hawaiian medical records system and invent bizarre theories than face their own internal turmoil or racism.
What people were willing to believe about Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans four years ago is a more serious matter. Of racism and cliche. The story, as the mainstream media presented it at the time, was about marauding hordes of looters, rapists and murderers swarming through the streets. The descriptions were pretty clearly focused on African-Americans, the great majority left behind in the evacuation of the city (which was then two-thirds black anyway).
There were supposed to be a lot of murder victims and murderers in the Superdome, the sports stadium the city opened up as a refuge of last resort. The rumors were believed so fervently that they were used to turn New Orleans into a prison city, with supplies and would-be rescuers prevented from entering and the victims prevented from being evacuated. The belief that a Hobbesian war of all-against-all had broken loose justified treating the place as a crime zone or even a hostile country, rather than a place in which grandmothers and toddlers were stranded in hideous conditions, desperately in need of food, water, shelter and medical attention.
Louisiana’s governor at the time, Kathleen Blanco, announced as she dispatched National Guard troops: “I have one message for these hoodlums: these troops know how to shoot and kill, and they are more than willing to do so if necessary, and I expect they will.”
She and the city’s mayor had called off the rescue efforts to focus on protecting private property — with lethal force if necessary. The sheriff of the suburb across the Crescent City Connection bridge from downtown New Orleans turned back stranded tourists and locals at gunpoint.
“As we approached the bridge, armed Gretna sheriffs formed a line across the foot of the bridge. Before we were close enough to speak, they began firing their weapons over our heads,” wrote two stranded paramedics.
Katrina was a fairly terrible natural disaster, but it turned into a horrific social catastrophe because of the response of the people in power, spurred on by their willingness to believe a hysterical, rumor-mongering media. (Journalists on the ground were often fiercely empathic and right on the mark, but those at a remove were all too willing to believe the usual tsunami of cliches about disaster and human nature.)
The story that few can wrap their minds around is that ordinary people mostly behaved well — there were six bodies in the Superdome, including four natural deaths and a suicide, not the hundreds that the federal government expected when it sent massive refrigerator trucks to collect the corpses. On the other hand, people in power behaved appallingly, panicking, spreading rumors, and themselves showing an eagerness to kill and a pathological lack of empathy.
Amusingly, the New Orleans Police Department stripped a Cadillac dealership of its cars, some of which were found as far away as Texas. Less amusingly, they shot a couple of unarmed — and, of course, black — family groups on the Danziger Bridge shortly after the storm in the only such incident to receive much press coverage. A middle-aged mother had her forearm blown off; a mentally disabled 40-year-old on his way to his brother’s dental office was shot five times in the back and died, and a teenager was also killed.
Truth, the first casualty of war, is pretty imperiled in disasters, too. One group of suburban white men who believed the rumors or just anticipated that in the absence of authority we all become monsters, became monsters themselves, even as they fantasized they were preserving order. These men in Algiers Point, across the river from the city of New Orleans, gathered an arsenal and launched their own little murder spree, killing several black men and injuring and threatening others.
They were the real rampaging gangs and they were not shy about what they did — they boasted of it to videographers and have talked openly about it since and with confidence, since there have to date been no legal repercussions. They claimed to be defending their property and their neighborhood, but their most vocal surviving victim, Donnell Herrington, was an armored truck driver trying to evacuate after he had stayed behind to take care of his grandparents. Herrington, who rescued those grandparents and dozens of neighbors by boat from their flooded apartment complex, then tried to find an evacuation point in Algiers for himself and was shot twice at close range with a shotgun and nearly bled to death before neighbors got him to hospital. The vigilantes shot him because he was black, because they could get away with it and because they were inflamed by the news accounts.
The story was not hard to find, and I picked up a lot of pieces of it while doing research for a book on disaster and civil society. Though New Orleans was overrun by national and international journalists, no one would touch it until I enlisted the brilliant investigative journalist A.C. Thompson. Despite his cover story in the Nation that included admissions of murder, many still deny that the killings took place. Given a choice between their world view and the facts, some choose the world view.
Most people behave beautifully in disasters (and most Americans, incidentally, believe Obama was born in their country). The majority in Katrina took care of each other, went to great lengths to rescue each other — including the “cajun navy” of white guys with boats who entered the flooded city the day after the levees broke — and were generally humane and resourceful. A minority, that included the most powerful, believed they were preventing barbarism while they embodied it.
We are entering an era of heightened disaster, thanks to climate change. Being prepared for disaster will mean being prepared to sift truth from rumor, and being prepared to adjust our world view. There is some incredible ugliness to the truth about Katrina, but, four years on, the lies hide more beauty, and hide where our dangers and our salvation may lie in times of crisis.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath