The idea of George Sodini, the 48-year-old systems analyst who shot dead three women and wounded nine others after randomly opening fire at a Latin dance class in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, is terrifying. For obvious reasons — he shot women dead in a gym — but also because details emerging from blogs he posted reveal him to be symbolic of a subculture of male rage that, despite all evidence to the contrary, blames women (dominating women, contemptuous women, icy women, just plain uninterested women) for everything bad that happens to them.
According to Sodini, he was a “total malfunction.” No girlfriend since 1984. No sex since 1990, “rejected by 30 million” (his estimate of how many desirable single women exist).
“Who knows why?” Sodini wrote. “I am not ugly or too weird.”
Really? Some might say that weird is a tame way to describe the act of driving to a gym to shoot people.
“Girls and women don’t give me a second look anywhere,” Sodini wrote.
With these words, he could be another George Costanza, the Everyman sexual loser in Seinfeld, complaining to Jerry in their local diner. Indeed, elsewhere, video footage shows Sodini sitting in “rapt attention” at dating seminars. Another time, another context, a very “Costanza” thing to do.
What is happening here? Were the horrific events in Pittsburgh some kind of singleton Columbine? Instead of misfit, loner, high-school kids stalking corridors killing classmates, a misfit, middle-aged dating reject guns down women at salsa classes because he isn’t getting laid?
Or is it bigger and weirder than that? Is Sodini an extreme example of a more widespread subliminal male rage that can take many forms but shares a common thread — that it is all women’s fault?
VENOM, SCORN
Male rage does have a habit of popping up. Hardly a week seems to go by without inordinate amounts of venom and scorn being aimed in the direction of prominent female politicians. Elsewhere, I have noticed a distinct increase in musings on how over-assertive women only have ourselves to blame if our men are weak and emasculated. We have outmanned and unmanned them — what bitches we are!
This isn’t even counting the drear that’s always there, especially on the Internet, from bitter rantings on divorce sites, to full-throttle misogyny on openly women-hating sites.
And now we have Sodini on his blogs and videos, blaming all his ills on a dominant mother (the ultimate male rage target) and the “30 million” who rejected him.
It all goes to prove it’s not the dick-swingers that women should be afraid of — the ignored man, the unsuccessful man, can be the most dangerous of all.
But this is not the whole story. Something has to explain how female dating failure leads to Bridget Jones, while for men the same road can lead to George Sodini.
MASS APOLOGY
It makes you wonder what these raging males want — a mass apology from womankind for being assertive and for not particularly fancying them? Are we actually supposed to placate and appease the kind of man who signs off a blog with the cheery cry: “Death lives!”
Sodini could be classed as just a random psychopath. In some ways, that’s comforting. Far better that than the idea that for some men out there this kind of thing is becoming a distinct manifesto.
The dark paradox is that if Sodini felt his social status was demeaned by his lack of success with women, he probably wasn’t even shooting at the correct gender. It’s men who tend to torture other men about status, just as women tend to torture other women about body image.
Therefore, it’s men, not women, who were responsible for Sodini’s misery. In the meantime, women should be aware: Male rage is dangerous and may be more widespread than you think. Be careful who you don’t fancy.
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
Taiwan has lost Trump. Or so a former State Department official and lobbyist would have us believe. Writing for online outlet Domino Theory in an article titled “How Taiwan lost Trump,” Christian Whiton provides a litany of reasons that the William Lai (賴清德) and Donald Trump administrations have supposedly fallen out — and it’s all Lai’s fault. Although many of Whiton’s claims are misleading or ill-informed, the article is helpfully, if unintentionally, revealing of a key aspect of the MAGA worldview. Whiton complains of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s “inability to understand and relate to the New Right in America.” Many
RSS