What a pleasure it is to witness government agencies and the private sector deliver the latest extension to a public transport network that continues to transform the way that people live in — and think about — the Greater Taipei area.
The opening of the MRT’s Neihu Line on Saturday inevitably attracted criticism over hiccups with safety measures, journey delays and the smaller capacity of the cars that will supplement the Muzha Line carriages. The many years that it took to complete the line also attracted no shortage of criticism.
Indeed, the discomfort that some passengers have reported on trial runs — particularly the handicapped — is a result of planning and oversight problems that the Taipei City Government should take note of and rectify as soon as possible.
It is essential that the same mistake is not made when adding carriages to extensions under construction. If cars with such limited capacity are commissioned for the Songshan, Sinjhuang and Xinyi lines — extensions of lines with much larger passenger loads (the Sindian, Jhonghe and Tamsui lines respectively) — there will be hell to pay.
Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin’s (郝龍斌) last-minute decision to reserve sections of the new Neihu Line cars for the disabled was praiseworthy, but also highlighted the fact that something went wrong in the tendering process and that nobody did anything about it — or cared —- until it was too late. Of greater concern is the possibility that corners were deliberately cut and money saved by compromising on passenger comfort and accessibility.
In balance, however, the Neihu Line is a welcome addition to Taipei’s superb MRT system. It ushers a growing and increasingly congested district of northern Taipei into a network that has had a profoundly positive impact on the local economy, air quality and Greater Taipei’s sense of civic unity. And if competent management of the MRT continues, there is a good chance that lines in the planning stage will get the green light, potentially doubling the size of the system as it stands.
Taxi drivers may not be so happy as the MRT extends into more outlying areas. Their dwindling income amid excessive issuance of taxi licenses is sure to take another hit. Still, to an extent, the government will continue to do the industry a favor by ceasing MRT operations at the surprisingly early hour of 1am on most lines.
For everyone else, the growth of the MRT is helping to transform previously unfashionable parts of the metropolis into gentrified, middle class-friendly zones that attract increased government spending and commercial interest — not to mention acting as a big boost for property owners and investors.
Like his predecessors, Hau opened the line with a big smile on his face, and so he should: Nothing has ever covered a Taipei mayor with glory like the opening of an MRT line. Unlike his immediate predecessor, Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who waited an eternity for MRT payback, Hau is likely to gain substantial political capital from the pending opening of most of the Taipei City segment of the Sinjhuang Line next year — the year he will run for re-election. Valuable capital it is, too, given that in most respects Hau’s term has been wholly unremarkable.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with