‘Disgrace’ in Geneva
After a banquet for World Health Assembly (WHA) delegates at a restaurant in Geneva on Saturday, Department of Health Minister Yeh Ching-chuan (葉金川) was greeted by a group of Taiwanese students who confronted him with tough questions and demanded to know if Taiwan’s sovereignty had been compromised in exchange for being an observer at this year’s WHA conference.
The volley of questions annoyed the minister so much he practically told the students to get lost, calling them a disgraceful bunch. Yeh uttered words that were not befitting someone of his status.
Perhaps realizing that he had behaved childishly and anticipating an inevitable media onslaught, Yeh later held a press conference and shed tears while saying “no one loves Taiwan more than I do.”
The whole melodramatic episode deserves a closer reading. The first question is why the minister lost his cool.
The answer is that Taiwan’s sovereignty has ceased to exist since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office. Yeh knows this and he expected the students who heckled him to be likewise informed.
The second question is why Yeh held a press conference.
On the surface, it was a pre-emptive measure against inevitable criticism from the pan-green camp and the media.
But it could also be read as a child’s cry for a pacifier. This need was satisfied when Ma sent words of support. The pan-blue media also rallied in support, giving Yeh an enormous binky by portraying the students as a reckless and disgraceful bunch.
YANG CHUNHUI
Salt Lake City, Utah
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor