Taiwan dangling in limbo
The US State Department recognizes 194 states, including city-states such as the Holy See and Singapore and the principalities, or “micro-states,” of Liechtenstein and Monaco.
Excluded from this list is an entity that the State Department says may or may not be considered a country, depending on who you talk to.
The outsider is Taiwan, which meets all requirements for a sovereign country.
That Taiwan meets all criteria of a sovereign country is absolutely indisputable and beyond contention:
1. It has a clearly defined territory with internationally recognized boundaries.
2. It has a permanent population who possess identity cards, passports and home residency certificates.
3. It has a highly organized and advanced economy; it regulates both foreign and domestic trade/commerce. It issues its own currency.
4. It maintains educational institutions at all levels, thus proving itself capable of “social engineering.”
5. It has a highly developed transportation system for moving both people and goods.
6. It has five branches of government (executive, legislative, judicial, oversight and examination), in addition to a police force.
7. It has its own armed forces — army, navy, air force and marines.
8. It has a postal and banking system.
9. It has sovereignty over its defined territory.
10. It is recognized (albeit limited recognition) by other countries.
Tawan’s political problems have their sources in three main areas.
The deluded, megalomaniacal fools who control Taiwan pathetically insist that they have sovereignty over territory that they do not control. They pathetically cling to the chimerical “Republic of China,” which was superseded decades ago by the communist government of the People’s Republic of China across the Taiwan Strait. It is the abysmally wide gap or disjunction between reality and the delusional perceptions of Taiwan’s present rulers that causes so much trouble for Taiwan.
Taiwan’s problems are also a result of China’s incessant bullying, intimidation and meddling.
Lastly, Taiwan’s problems come, in no small measure, from political expediency, hypocrisy and shameful cowardice on the part of other nations — especially the “Great Western Democracies.” As an American, I am forced to admit that the US can be assigned much of the blame in regard to Taiwan’s unfortunate status.
Taiwan’s lonely “outsider” status is the result of dreadfully misguided policies by enemies of Taiwan — both external and internal.
MICHAEL SCANLON
East Hartford, Connecticut
Parking needs to be green
Park your car in downtown Hualien for more than a minute and you’re bound to find a parking ticket fluttering on your windshield.
The city is extremely vigilant about ensuring that drivers pay to park. The city counts on this revenue, and rightly so.
My question is: Why do the parking enforcement officers drive around on scooters while issuing these tickets rather than riding bicycles?
There is a veritable army of enforcement officers patrolling very short “beats” of typically between one and two blocks in the downtown core.
Each officer does nothing but drive back and forth, issuing tickets in his or her short area, covering the same piece of ground literally hundreds of times each day.
The result, of course, is a lot of totally unnecessary pollution, not to mention unwarranted expense.
The environmentally friendly and cost-effective solution seems obvious: Replace these scooters with bicycles.
Selling the existing fleet of scooters could cover the cost of acquiring the bicycles, and the city would immediately realize significant savings by cutting fuel, maintenance and insurance costs.
In addition, locals and tourists alike could breathe easier with this sizable fleet of polluting scooters taken off the roads.
I hope the Hualien City government will recognize the merits of this course of action and do the responsible thing by making the change immediately.
It’s high time to go green!
JASON GRENIER
Hualien
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
RSS