Tue, May 05, 2009 - Page 9 News List

The museum whose architecture is at odds with its displays

The Judisches Museum Berlin is a major letdown, preferring exaggerated effects and dull homogeneity over historical, empirical and emotional substance

By Edward Rothstein  /  NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE , BERLIN

There may be worse Jewish museums in the world than the Judisches Museum Berlin, which opened in 2001. But it is difficult to imagine that any could be as uninspiring and banal, particularly given its pedigree and promise. Has any other Jewish museum been more celebrated or its new building (designed by Daniel Libeskind) so widely hailed? Is any other Jewish museum of more symbolic importance?

This is the largest such institution in Europe, a national museum devoted to exploring the history of a people this country was once intent on eradicating. Is there any museum of any kind more laden with the baggage of guilt and suffering, of restitution and tribute?

So many museums deal with recollections of trauma that Berlin’s fraught examples are illuminating. Ruin and relics are part of renovation here. When the destroyed Neue Synagoge was being restored, it was clear that the 19th century structure, with its ornate echoes of Alhambra, could never be reconstituted. So its extraordinary facade, rededicated in 1995, frames not a house of worship but a modest exhibition on a particular Jewish community and its once-thriving synagogue, while fragments of the original building’s altar are pieced together like an unfinished puzzle.

The Judisches Museum inverts the formula.

Here, it is the new — the building created by Libeskind — that invokes scars and wreckage. The old is suggested by its contents — largely text, images, reproductions and interactive displays that are meant to conjure a past worthy of celebration.

This museum may even be considered a German example of a genre dominant in the US: the “identity” museum. Typically, the identity museum recounts how a particular ethnic group has survived, chronicling its travails and triumphs, culminating in the institution’s own prideful displays. Here, of course, the Holocaust interrupts the uplift. But the overarching idea was to reveal something about the people Hitler set out to obliterate by surveying the rich, complicated history of Jews in Germany.

So while the narrative begins with evocations of the Holocaust, it is meant to end, if not in redemption for Germans or Jews, at least in a kind of mutual respect. In the museum’s catalog, German Commissioner for Cultural Affairs Julian Nida-Ruemelin points out that the institution may be providing “the only contact many non-Jewish Germans have with Jews and Judaism” outside their history classes.

The museum’s curator, W. Michael Blumenthal, explains, too, that the exhibition’s story “far transcends” the history of German Jewry, demonstrating “a widely shared determination” to apply its lessons “to societal problems of today and tomorrow” and promoting “tolerance toward minorities in a globalized world.”

The resulting strain is almost bipolar, with the building screaming about apocalypse as its exhibition affirms harmonious universalism, with neither making its case.

The building, for example, proposes that the shattered, fractured world of the Holocaust is best suggested by shattered, fractured space. You enter the exhibition by descending a lobby staircase that leads into a world of skewed geometry. The floors are raked and tilted. Displays are off-kilter. And rather than feeling something profound, you almost expect moving platforms and leaping ghosts, as in a fun park’s house of horrors.

This story has been viewed 1579 times.
TOP top