After an agreement was reached at the latest round of talks between the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) to open Taiwan to Chinese investment, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said the government planned to allow Chinese investment in 98 categories, including air and sea ports, infrastructure, manufacturing and the service sector. The Financial Supervisory Commission said Chinese institutional investors could purchase up to 10 percent of stakes in companies listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. The TAIEX stock index has risen 6.47 percent on speculation about potential investment, including China Mobile’s (中國移動) move to invest in Far EasTone (遠傳電信).
The rise in stock prices is heartening, but as the bourse reflects the state of the economy, any ups and downs that stray from the fundamentals won’t last long. Right now, those fundamentals are worse than ever — there is a recession, unemployment is soaring, exports are down and the fiscal deficit is troubling. Last month, the IMF predicted negative 7.5 percent growth for Taiwan this year and zero growth next year.
Before Taiwan’s fundamentals improve, any rebound on the stock market can only be the short-term result of speculation. Even if Chinese companies are eyeing Taiwan’s stock market and China-based Taiwanese businesspeople want to invest at home, this will not be sufficient to turn the economy around. Meanwhile, attributing the rise in the stock market to cross-strait reconciliation could lead to unrealistic expectations and slacken efforts to revive the economy.
Taiwan has no lack of funds, so attracting Chinese capital is not needed, nor will opening up to Chinese investors necessarily be good for Taiwan. Chinese investment will not be purely business — the ultimate goal from Beijing’s perspective is to trap Taiwan. China has enormous foreign currency reserves — more than enough for a spending spree in Taiwan. The purpose may be to obtain key technologies or secure a controlling interest in Taiwanese financial, telecommunications, aeronautics, media, construction and high-tech companies. Once China has a hold on these economic lifelines, Taiwan will find itself in the same position as Hong Kong in the 1990s — shackled by China, with no way out.
Now that the government has thrown open the doors, Chinese investment will pour in. Although the government says there will be limits on this investment, past experience shows that such constraints have limited effect.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) instituted a policy of “go slow and be patient,” and his successor, Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), called for “effective management and active opening.” Lee and Chen’s policies were both meant to keep out Chinese capital, but it arrived nonetheless, disguised as foreign or Hong Kong capital or investment by China-based Taiwanese businesses. Now Ma has opened Pandora’s box.
In the short term, it has boosted stock prices, but as time goes by there will be negative consequences. There will be friction and competition between the two sides and there will be mergers. Rather than rejoicing, the public should ask where Ma’s policies will take Taiwan in the long term.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under