The speed at which cross-strait exchanges have developed since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office has surprised many in Taiwan and around the world.
A year ago, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was still in office and cross-strait relations were tense. Now, Taiwan is sending a delegation to the Boao Forum in China’s Hainan Province, where it will meet with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶), while another group is holding a meeting in Taiwan to prepare for the third meeting between representatives from Taiwan and China.
The latter meeting will discuss the liberalizing of Chinese investment in Taiwan’s manufacturing industry; probably sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) on financial supervision; and touch on the issue of an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA).
The government believes China is the panacea for Taiwan’s economy, though this assertion continues to attract skepticism among many Taiwanese. The opening up of Taiwan to Chinese investment will be channeled through the stock market, which will give China control of Taiwanese companies and access to Taiwanese technology. This will slow Taiwan’s economic growth and sap it of the energy needed to transform industries.
The high-tech, food, textile and defense industries should remain closed to Chinese money, and even deregulated industries should have upper limits on cross-strait investments, while Chinese investors should not be allowed to hold boardroom posts that would facilitate technology flow to China.
In the past, the government encouraged developed countries to invest here to attract new technology and management and to ease entry into the global market. Since Chinese industrial technology lags behind Taiwan’s, Chinese investments will access technology at the expense of Taiwan’s stock market. Moreover, China could employ links through contractors to coopt local political figures and factions, thus corroding democratic processes.
If an MOU is signed and the government allows Chinese banks to open branches here, local banks will be their primary rivals and first targets. An added problem is that the MOU would not establish a firewall between the Taiwanese and Chinese financial systems, which means the specter of bad debt could enter the market. And if slowing economic growth in China heightens the present crisis, Taiwan will be dragged down with it.
Although the government has pledged not to open Taiwan to Chinese farm produce and not to harm local business interests, the Chinese premier, speaking at the Boao Forum, has called for a free market for Chinese products. Once Taiwan throws open its economic door, Ma will be faced with a choice: stick to his pledge and incur the anger of Beijing, or bow to Wen’s expectations.
If the government continues to focus on the economic side of cross-strait detente while ignoring its political, social and national security implications, it may find itself facing some rather unpalatable dilemmas. Cross-strait economic deregulation is an irreversible process; the government therefore should tread very cautiously and not sacrifice Taiwan’s long-term interests to see out a short-term recession.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with