Thu, Apr 09, 2009 - Page 9 News List

Wikipedia ate their lunch

‘Encyclopedia Britannica’ was the standard for accuracy and comprehensiveness until Encarta floored it, only to be replaced itself by the Wikipedia juggernaut

By John Naughton  /  THE GUARDIAN , LONDON

I’m tired of listening to brain-dead dinner-party complaints about how “inaccurate” Wikipedia is. I’m bored to death by endless accounts of slurs or libels suffered by a few famous individuals at the hands of Wikipedia vandals. And if anyone ever claims again that all the entries in Wikipedia are written by clueless amateurs, I will hit them over the head with a list of experts who curate material in their specialisms. And remind them of Professor Peter Murray-Rust’s comment to a conference in Oxford: “The bit of Wikipedia that I wrote is correct.”

Of course Wikipedia has flaws, of course it has errors; show me something that doesn’t. Of course it suffers from vandalism and nutters who contribute stuff to it. But instead of complaining about errors, academics ought to be in there fixing them. Wikipedia is one of the greatest inventions we have. Isn’t it time we accepted it? Microsoft has.

This story has been viewed 4673 times.
TOP top