With ASEAN Plus One (China) and ASEAN Plus Three (China, Japan and South Korea) coming into effect next year and in 2015 respectively, highly competitive Japanese and South Korean products such as semiconductors, liquid-crystal displays, petrochemicals and machinery will be given tax-exempt access to the ASEAN market, which accounts for 15 percent of Taiwan’s exports.
With the exception of some products that enjoy tax exemption within the WTO framework, Taiwanese exports will be subject to a tax rate of approximately 6 percent, which happens to equal the net profit margin of the nation’s industries. This will put Taiwan in an unfavorable position.
Furthermore, these industries account for nearly 20 percent of the nation’s production value and 15 percent of the nation’s GDP. If the government lets them wither, it would make the unemployment situation worse. However, an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) is aimed at promoting economic and trade liberalization across the Taiwan Strait rather than between Taiwan and ASEAN or between Taiwan and Japan or South Korea.
In other words, even if Taiwan were to ink an economic pact with China, Taiwanese products would not enjoy preferential treatment from ASEAN members, let alone free trade with Japan and Korea.
In economics, tariff-jumping means that when faced with high export tariffs, companies may choose to move to a location that allows them to escape tariffs. For example, Japanese car companies set up manufacturing plants in the US to deal with US import tariffs. By the same logic, when ASEAN Plus Three takes effect, Taiwan’s exports will face higher tariffs, possibly leading companies to relocate their factories to places that impose lower tariffs.
Given this situation, the Taiwanese manufacturing industry would wither away, but this is just the beginning of the story.
Over the past 20 years of globalization, Taiwanese companies have set up factories throughout the ASEAN area and in China. Thus, after ASEAN Plus Three comes into effect, Taiwanese companies will not lose their competitiveness, but they will become less competitive by setting up factories in Taiwan.
The root cause of the problem lies in Taiwan’s industrial structure. If the government protects the industries that are in keen competition with South Korea, they are likely to move overseas following the launch of ASEAN Plus Three to evade increased costs from tariffs. An economic agreement with China would still lead to closures of Taiwanese companies unless Taiwan can transform and provide these industries with more advanced raw materials and technological licensing. In addition, to comply with regulations for a certificate of origin, it is likely that more Taiwanese companies will move their factories to China.
On the other hand, if Taiwan can extricate itself from the predicament arising out of intense competition with South Korea and heavy dependence on Japanese technology, and instead emulate northern European countries by developing new and innovative industries, ASEAN Plus Three would have little effect on Taiwan. Then, signing an economic pact with China would only normalize cross-strait economic and trade exchanges rather than relieve any pressure caused by the launch of ASEAN Plus Three.
The importance of upgrading the nation’s industrial structure has been overshadowed by the dispute over whether cross-strait trade should be normalized. This has also diverted the focus from the very important issue of the future development of Taiwanese industry.
Lian Ke-shaw is a doctoral candidate in international trade at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS