The past several months have been witness to how the global financial crisis resulting from the US subprime mortgage crisis has swept across Asia. However, other than forecasting slower economic growth or a contraction, most countries in the region have failed to come up with effective measures to deal with the downturn. This is not to suggest that governments are not doing anything about the crisis; it is just that policies implemented to date have not produced the desired results.
Taiwan’s East Asian neighbors have implemented several measures to boost domestic demand, including extending loans to businesses and doubling domestic infrastructure investments. Together, China, Japan and South Korea have proposed more than US$1.2 trillion in stimulus measures to revive their economies.
Apart from these individual economic policies, East Asian countries hope to promote more regional collective action and cooperation to shore up domestic consumer confidence and stabilize the regional economy by expanding the existing cooperation network. For instance, the high-level ASEAN Plus Three — ASEAN plus Japan, China and South Korea — forum held in the Indonesian capital of Jakarta on Feb. 20 was an important channel for member countries to exchange opinions and foster collective confidence.
Especially worthy of attention is the tacit agreement among the member countries of the ASEAN Plus Three on how to combat the global financial storm. ASEAN Plus Three finance ministers meeting in Phuket, Thailand, on Feb. 22 proposed an action plan based on increasing trade and investment to restore the regional economy and financial stability through closer regional cooperation. The ministers agreed to augment regional supervision, expand bilateral currency swap arrangements and enlarge the Chiang Mai Initiative reserve fund to US$120 billion, from US$80 billion. The resolutions made on the 14th ASEAN Summit held last Thursday further served as an indication of how the nations in the region are to rescue the economy.
Looking at the progress in East Asian cooperation, Taiwan seems to have been excluded from the recent regional dialogue mechanism. Although the government has adopted many measures to boost the domestic economy, neither foreign investors nor international research institutes have high hopes for Taiwan’s economic performance this year. The government’s recent push to sign an economic cooperation framework agreement with China has become a hotly debated topic between the ruling and opposition parties. Defenders of the proposed pact see the agreement as the only solution to boosting Taiwan’s economy, contending that the opposition has overly politicized the issue.
Even though signing an economic pact with China may be significant, the government should also carefully think of how it could seek a wider cooperation platform while drawing closer to Beijing, as well as how it could enhance global participation to mitigate the impact of the global financial crisis on Taiwan.
For the past decade, Taiwan has seen repeated calls for participation in the ASEAN Plus Three, but many of those proposals or policy suggestions have been politically motivated. The future of Taiwan is not something that pan-green or pan-blue politicians can gamble with. It’s a gamble politicians can afford, but one the public cannot afford to lose.
While China’s participation in ASEAN would further marginalize Taiwan, we should not think we should rush to do the same thing. The government and the public could start by first paying attention to the progress of this year’s ASEAN summit.
Yang Hao is a postdoctoral fellow at the Center for Asia-Pacific Area Studies.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
RSS