The past several months have been witness to how the global financial crisis resulting from the US subprime mortgage crisis has swept across Asia. However, other than forecasting slower economic growth or a contraction, most countries in the region have failed to come up with effective measures to deal with the downturn. This is not to suggest that governments are not doing anything about the crisis; it is just that policies implemented to date have not produced the desired results.
Taiwan’s East Asian neighbors have implemented several measures to boost domestic demand, including extending loans to businesses and doubling domestic infrastructure investments. Together, China, Japan and South Korea have proposed more than US$1.2 trillion in stimulus measures to revive their economies.
Apart from these individual economic policies, East Asian countries hope to promote more regional collective action and cooperation to shore up domestic consumer confidence and stabilize the regional economy by expanding the existing cooperation network. For instance, the high-level ASEAN Plus Three — ASEAN plus Japan, China and South Korea — forum held in the Indonesian capital of Jakarta on Feb. 20 was an important channel for member countries to exchange opinions and foster collective confidence.
Especially worthy of attention is the tacit agreement among the member countries of the ASEAN Plus Three on how to combat the global financial storm. ASEAN Plus Three finance ministers meeting in Phuket, Thailand, on Feb. 22 proposed an action plan based on increasing trade and investment to restore the regional economy and financial stability through closer regional cooperation. The ministers agreed to augment regional supervision, expand bilateral currency swap arrangements and enlarge the Chiang Mai Initiative reserve fund to US$120 billion, from US$80 billion. The resolutions made on the 14th ASEAN Summit held last Thursday further served as an indication of how the nations in the region are to rescue the economy.
Looking at the progress in East Asian cooperation, Taiwan seems to have been excluded from the recent regional dialogue mechanism. Although the government has adopted many measures to boost the domestic economy, neither foreign investors nor international research institutes have high hopes for Taiwan’s economic performance this year. The government’s recent push to sign an economic cooperation framework agreement with China has become a hotly debated topic between the ruling and opposition parties. Defenders of the proposed pact see the agreement as the only solution to boosting Taiwan’s economy, contending that the opposition has overly politicized the issue.
Even though signing an economic pact with China may be significant, the government should also carefully think of how it could seek a wider cooperation platform while drawing closer to Beijing, as well as how it could enhance global participation to mitigate the impact of the global financial crisis on Taiwan.
For the past decade, Taiwan has seen repeated calls for participation in the ASEAN Plus Three, but many of those proposals or policy suggestions have been politically motivated. The future of Taiwan is not something that pan-green or pan-blue politicians can gamble with. It’s a gamble politicians can afford, but one the public cannot afford to lose.
While China’s participation in ASEAN would further marginalize Taiwan, we should not think we should rush to do the same thing. The government and the public could start by first paying attention to the progress of this year’s ASEAN summit.
Yang Hao is a postdoctoral fellow at the Center for Asia-Pacific Area Studies.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
Birth, aging, illness and death are inevitable parts of the human experience. Yet, living well does not necessarily mean dying well. For those who have a chronic illness or cancer, or are bedridden due to significant injuries or disabilities, the remainder of life can be a torment for themselves and a hardship for their caregivers. Even if they wish to end their life with dignity, they are not allowed to do so. Bih Liu-ing (畢柳鶯), former superintendent of Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, introduced the practice of Voluntary Stopping of Eating and Drinking as an alternative to assisted dying, which remains
President William Lai (賴清德) has rightly identified the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as a hostile force; and yet, Taiwan’s response to domestic figures amplifying CCP propaganda remains largely insufficient. The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) recently confirmed that more than 20 Taiwanese entertainers, including high-profile figures such as Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜), are under investigation for reposting comments and images supporting People’s Liberation Army (PLA) drills and parroting Beijing’s unification messaging. If found in contravention of the law, they may be fined between NT$100,000 and NT$500,000. That is not a deterrent. It is a symbolic tax on betrayal — perhaps even a way for
RSS