Chinese agriculture has a lot of serious long-term problems. In inland regions, about 900 million poor farmers struggle to get by on an average annual income of less than US$600. One of the sector’s weak points is each farmer only has a small area of land to till — less than half the area available to each farmer in Taiwan. Many Chinese peasants are also uneducated and illiterate. Government fears of grassroots organizations have prevented the formation of farmer’s organizations that could have served as channels for education and training.
Chinese agricultural technology is backward and short on investment. Only the low cost of labor allows the sector to survive economically. Now, because of the knock-on effects of the global financial crisis, large numbers of rural migrant workers have been laid off from their jobs in the cities and are going back to their home villages. Clearly, finding solutions for the countryside is an urgent and difficult task for Beijing.
China’s proposals for agricultural cooperation with Taiwan may appear on the surface to be a goodwill gesture. The reality, however, is China urgently needs help from Taiwan in the form of funding and know-how. In considering how to respond, the government’s first concern should be the livelihood of Taiwanese farmers and the long-term development of Taiwan’s agriculture. It needs to consider the repercussions and crises that might ensue from cross-strait exchanges.
The government must also consider Taiwan’s global position. Countries like Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia are interested in cooperating with Taiwan in agriculture. It would be unwise to put all our eggs in one basket by favoring a country that has more than 1,000 missiles aimed at us.
Land is literally a fixed asset — it can’t be moved. The market for agricultural produce is limited and demand is not very flexible. Most countries have in place various measures intended to protect farmers’ interests and ensure the long-term development of their agriculture. It is hardly likely that countries would unconditionally offer funding and training to other nations. What is true of other countries is all the more so in the case of China and Taiwan.
Many problems have arisen as a consequence of cross-strait agricultural exchanges. For example, there have been numerous instances of Chinese businesses registering brand names before Taiwanese producers have a chance to do so. More than 90 percent of products marketed in China under famous Taiwanese brand names are counterfeit. Many brands have been targeted, including Gukeng coffee, Puli tea, Chihshang rice, Tung Ting oolong tea, Chuoshui rice and Kinmen gong sugar.
Cheap and inferior Chinese products marketed under Taiwanese brands have damaged the genuine articles’ reputation and undermined their prices in overseas markets. The products affected include flowers such as moth orchids and fruits such as mangoes and wax apples. Chinese moth orchids have grabbed 60 percent of the US market away from Taiwanese ones. In 1990, Taiwan was Japan’s second-biggest source of agricultural imports. By 2005, China had taken Taiwan’s place at No. 2, while Taiwan slid to No. 13.
Another concern is the danger of plant and animal diseases entering Taiwan from China. It has already happened in the cases of foot-and-mouth disease, SARS and avian influenza.
Wrong policies could spell the death of Taiwanese agriculture and leave future generations precariously dependent on others for their food and drink. In view of the risks, cross-strait exchanges must be treated with a suitable degree of caution.
Chen Shih-shiung is president of the Association of Taiwan Organic Agriculture Promotion.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS