Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇) caused an uproar this week by proposing that 228 Memorial Day no longer be a public holiday. Backtracking in the face of a wave of criticism from families, friends and sympathizers of 228 Massacre victims, Wu announced the following day that he would drop the proposal in the legislature.
While the hubbub appears to have died down, the very fact that Wu thought he could submit such a proposal demonstrates an apparent ignorance of Taiwan’s history and a lack of respect for the country and its people.
No history of Taiwan can be told without references to the 228 Massacre. The calamity could be billed as the darkest days in Taiwan’s post-World War II history. It left a deep imprint on the nation’s psyche and had a profound impact on the country’s development. It ushered in the White Terror, during which tens of thousands of people were imprisoned, tortured and killed, while others lived in fear under the watchful eyes of the notorious Taiwan Garrison Command. To this day, many survivors of the victims live with agony and grief; some still don’t know where the remains of their loved ones were buried.
The government’s designation of Feb. 28 as a national day of mourning was part of the country’s healing process. Sixty-two years have passed and while the wounds may have healed, the scars remain. Wu’s comment that 228 was not worth holiday status ripped open those scars. What was he thinking?
That Wu, whom the media considers a key member of “Ma’s corps,” even pitched the idea shows he and many others like him have not learned their history lessons. But perhaps he was simply seeking his master’s approval.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has met 228 victims’ families many times in recent years and expressed regret over the incident. He also acknowledged the KMT’s “political” responsibility for 228 and promised to continue research into the incident and its aftermath. However, shortly after he took office in May, construction of the planned 228 National Memorial Hall was halted and the budget for the 228 Memorial Foundation was slashed by the KMT-controlled legislature. This latest move by a “Ma corps” member makes one question Ma’s sincerity once again, after his backtracking on promises to return the KMT’s stolen assets and so many other things. What about Ma’s claim to know what it meant to be Taiwanese?
The government’s recent announcement that it would remove the name plaque at National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall and replace it with the original Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall plaque has also done little to assuage the feelings of those injured by the 228 Incident. How will they feel having to once again see the name of dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who was singled out by the 2006 academic research report titled 228 Incident: A Report on Responsibility for his role in the matter, in full display and extolled by the Ma administration?
Wu, Ma and their brethren should heed the advice of Holocaust survivor and renowned author Elie Wiesel.
“I have tried to keep the memory alive. I have tried to fight those who would forget. Because if we forget, we are guilty ... not to remember would turn us into accomplices of the killers, to remember would turn anyone into a friend of the victims,” Wiesel said in his 1986 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech.
History should be remembered and respected. The 228 Incident is part of what made Taiwan what it is today and that must not be forgotten.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
RSS