SINCE ITS ESTABLISHMENT in 1941, the US-based international nongovernmental organization for human rights Freedom House has devoted itself to research on and advocating democracy and freedom around the world. It now plays a crucial role in the fight for freedom in the international community.
Freedom House held the global release of its most important publication, Freedom in the World, in Taipei last Tuesday. There was a special significance behind the release in Taiwan: Aside from affirming the achievements over the years in terms of democracy and freedom that have made Taiwan one of Asia’s most dynamic democracies, Freedom House’s decision to release its report in Taiwan at this time may have been an indication that it is concerned with regression of freedom and rights in Taiwan and the challenges that this poses.
The report is based on evaluations of the political rights and civil liberties of 193 countries and 16 regions. Eighty-nine countries were listed as “free,” 62 as “partly free” and 42 as “not free.” Taiwan was listed as “free,” while China was listed as “not free.”
Looking at past ratings, we can see that Taiwan was not listed as a “free” country in 1973. In 1977, it became “partly free” and has been listed as “free” since 1997. Especially worthy of attention is that in 2006, Taiwan scored a 1 for both political rights and civil liberties, which placed it among the freest countries in the world.
This year, Taiwan scored a 2 for political rights and 1 for civil liberties, which means that Taiwan continues to be ranked as a free country. Despite this ranking, Freedom House still requested that the Taiwanese government work on freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and association, as well as judicial independence.
China, meanwhile, scored 7 — the lowest possible score — for political rights and a 6 for civil liberties. Freedom House criticized China for not fulfilling the promises it made to improve human rights when it was granted the right to host the Olympic Games. Freedom House also said that China was strengthening its control of the Internet and media as well as quelling religious freedoms, meddling in the judiciary and crushing human rights.
As Taiwan continues its way toward freedom and democracy, China belongs with the countries that are being left behind. Obviously, freedom is the biggest thing that separates China and Taiwan, and the Taiwanese people need to cherish and uphold the freedom that we have worked so hard to obtain.
Chen Lung-chu is president of the Taiwan New Century Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS