The Ministry of Economic Affairs’ recent rejection of two industry consolidation proposals by local computer memory chipmakers raised the question of what role the government should play in helping the country’s struggling DRAM companies.
Given their mounting debt and the uncertain state of the sector, it has become clear that credit banks are unlikely to lend money to local DRAM companies. On the other hand, the government is also hesitant to inject funds into local DRAM companies that cannot gain access to foreign partners’ technological know-how and develop homegrown technology in Taiwan.
ProMOS faces problems repaying US$330 million in overseas convertible bonds that will mature on Feb. 14, only two weeks after the Lunar New Year holiday.
To rescue ProMOS, the Chinese-language Economic Daily News said in a front-page story published on Thursday that credit banks might pump cash into the money-losing company in the form of loans, later converting the loans into shares in the firm.
While this idea gained inspiration from the comeback of Hynix Semiconductor Inc in South Korea a few years ago, the possibility of its success in Taiwan is questionable because ProMOS in no way looks like Hynix, either in terms of production scale or technological strength.
Moreover, this loan-equity conversion will still be subject to the approval of bank shareholders and financial regulators, and that is never an easy job.
On Friday, the director-general of the Industrial Development Bureau — a government agency that is in charge of reviewing DRAM companies’ industry consolidation proposals in exchange for a government bailout — told reporters that the government did not want any local DRAM companies to fail.
The official said that to maximize the effectiveness of government aid, it would like to see local DRAM companies consolidate into one to two groups with independent technology.
Unfortunately, the proposal’s rejection suggested local DRAM companies were experiencing difficulty convincing foreign partners to help develop homegrown technology in Taiwan. The chairman of Powerchip Semiconductor Corp said bluntly that an immediate cash injection was what the companies needed most, with industry consolidation and technological independence being a long-term goal.
Clearly, local DRAM companies desperately need cash. But that money will not come from private investors as long as the companies’ losses continue to grow. Therefore, the government seems to have little option but to play the role of savior.
The problem is whether the government’s goal is to protect the industry or save individual companies. There are reasons to question whether it is a waste of taxpayers’ money if the individual companies receiving government funds are doomed to fail with or without a bailout.
If the collapse of individual companies benefits the industry as a whole, then let it be so. If the government’s bailout effort only perpetuates the sector’s long-term weakness, this effort should be stopped now.
One way or another, the government should prepare for a possible collapse and try to reduce any negative impact while beefing up investors’ confidence.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
RSS