As the year commences, Microsoft is previewing its next-generation operating system, Windows 7, which is remarkable only in that it is almost the same as every previous version. Stagnation in computer design is not surprising, considering that familiarity is so comfortable.
But it can also stifle development. Military intelligence depends on ever-improving communication, so it is one area in which system design is constantly changing. Some of those innovations will eventually trickle into the mainstream, so a glimpse at current experiments can reveal what the future of ordinary computer interaction could look like and what would be gained.
For the lay user, technology is encountered mostly as an interactive interface. People rarely consider that the tangible features assumed to be intrinsic to the “computer” were imitations of other objects, with keyboards inherited from typewriters and screens from television.
Inside the computer screen is a virtual 1950’s office, with paper documents, filing cabinets and a garbage can. This page-window format is known as Window-Icon-Mouse-Pointer, or WIMP, which, due to monopoly forces, has been the universal paradigm since the 1980s — ancient history in computer years.
These formats are taken for granted, just as we accept telephone keypads and car dashboards, which are also user interfaces. It is easy to forget that, years ago, telephones had no buttons or dial — you had to pick up the handset and ask an operator to make the connection. The telephone dial didn’t appear until 1919, when the first group of self-designated “user interface scientists” at Western Electric considered what the most intuitive form should be.
When improving a computer interface, form is the key. We’ve seen hints of a new paradigm in Apple’s iPhone, which allows gestural finger motions, but in the intelligence community, concept visualization can be so radical that most ordinary users might barely recognize what it was. Designs are inspired by cognitive science, the arts, even science fiction. Ironically, a recent trend reaches far into the past, to a traditional Japanese concept known as katachi, which is emerging as an international movement.
Katachi literally means “form” in Japanese, but the concept has complex connotations that do not exist in other languages. The word is a composite of two terms, kata (pattern) and chi (magical power), so it includes nuances such as “complete assembly” and “shape that tells an attractive story.”
This richer notion stems from ancient Japanese culture, which perceived the overlap between geometry and meaning. The Chinese symbol for “form” carries some of the same reasoning, because of its use of ideograms. Four thousand years ago, China developed a writing system that conveyed concepts both as idea and picture. Notions such as “wooden structure” and “beauty” were indicated by symbols which, when combined, could create a new concept, such as “form.”
Governments in countries colonized by China were forced to adopt this pictographic writing system in order to receive political regulations, but the pronunciation of the characters was not controlled. The colonized were able to maintain aspects of their local culture through different aural versions of the same written “word,” because the common meaning existed only in the shape.
Modern user interface scientists are interested in katachi because it can reveal how form facilitates human interaction. A traditional example is the tea ceremony, which was developed in Japan in the late 16th century. The format is simple — a host serves tea with some sweets, the guests drink it and then express thanks. That’s all.
Foreigners are often mystified as to why such a minimalist event can require years of training. But the motivation for this art is common to every culture — imagine a talented host from any country whose manner is so easy that guests are wrapped in a mood of quiet happiness.
In the tea ceremony, this ability has been refined into a skill that combines materials, meaning and mood. Those with high ability know how the guests’ experience can be improved with careful preparations of tools, reflective conversations and natural yet well-controlled body motions. Physical movements embody the intended meaning of the event, so the whole environment becomes a signifier. Small innovations are often introduced into the style of hospitality to suggest the personality of the host.
An operating system based on katachi’s insights would harness this overlap between shape, sense and environment. It might allow you to feel the “form” of a concept with your hands. Or it could indicate the reliability of data based on whether it was laid out neatly or had a scrambled appearance, so it could be assessed at a glance. Perhaps future interfaces will allow us to communicate across language barriers by immersing us in assemblies of pictures — a hybrid between movies, architecture and email.
Expressive icons represent thought, but can only communicate complex subtleties and situations if they allow multiple levels of understanding. Computer scientists might be in a unique position to enable richer communication and perhaps a more stable future as a consequence. For this reason, let us hope that more developers explore this so-called “disruptive” side of technology during the coming year.
H.T. Goranson is the lead scientist for Earl Research and was a former senior scientist with the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Ryuji Takaki, a physicist, is editor-in-chief of the journal Forma and was formerly president of Katachi No Kagaku Kai (Society for Science on Form).
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS