Though there were no details, the Ministry of Economic Affairs indicated last week that the government supports a bailout of local manufacturers of dynamic random access memory (DRAM) chips given the implications of the sector’s collapse.
Investors welcomed the government’s stance and boosted shares of major DRAM firms by an average 30 percent this week, shrugging off concerns over a new accounting rule for inventories, effective Jan. 1, that will likely undercut gross margins.
At a press conference on Tuesday, Vice Minister of Economic Affairs Shih Yen-shiang (施顏祥) said that in light of the DRAM sector’s national importance, the government wanted to use the global downturn to “turn a crisis into an opportunity.”
Shih said that the government’s aim was to help DRAM makers build homegrown technology and boost international competitiveness.
It is an important policy and enunciates a vital development goal for the industry. But questions could be raised over whether the bailout will reach optimal effectiveness if it also hurts the ability of other industries — such as struggling flat-panel-display manufacturers — to access government aid.
Local DRAM makers have invested more than NT$850 billion (US$26.13 billion) in the last 10 years, creating an industry supply chain that ranges from upstream chip manufacturing to downstream packaging and testing, as well as module production.
Many say that the DRAM sector is important because the nation’s output accounts for 22.4 percent of the global market, a figure second only to South Korea. When it comes to profitability, however, local DRAM players have suffered from several quarterly losses amid a glut. The industry’s gross margins will likely remain thin in light of significant competition in this highly commoditized and volatile market.
Government figures show the nation’s top five DRAM makers posting combined losses of NT$93.87 billion in the first nine months of the year. Worse still, the combination of global credit crunch and economic slowdown this year has resulted in DRAM makers securing fewer loans as well as suffering chip prices below cost. To date, aggregated debt in the industry stands at NT$431.3 billion, and some firms are on the brink of bankruptcy.
The government said its short-term plan was to help DRAM makers extend loans and adjust terms of payment while marking funds for the cash-strapped sector in exchange for stakes in the companies.
As for the long term, the government said it welcomed consolidation and stressed that it would not confine consolidation to mere mergers of existing players, but also include collaborative research and development as well as joint manufacturing.
A collapse of even one company could cause substantial job losses up and down the chain and even endanger the operations of creditors. The government’s support is thus better than nothing.
But the government must keep in mind that its role is also to look after the interests of other important industries — and especially those of taxpayers.
To prevent DRAM companies from squandering bailout funds, the government needs to carefully review company proposals on the revamping of operations. It must also ask the companies to develop a pragmatic approach so that industry consolidation can be facilitated and so that taxpayer dollars will enhance the sector’s competitiveness — whether in terms of production capacity or next-generation technology.
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
RSS