After years of being blamed for job losses in the US and elsewhere, India’s high-tech companies and outsourcing firms are going through a downturn of their own. The global slowdown is forcing them to reduce hiring, freeze salaries, postpone new investments and lay off thousands of software programmers and call center operators.
While some industry insiders insist the global crisis will actually benefit companies in India, as Western businesses seek to cut costs by moving jobs overseas, right now the sector is gripped by an unfamiliar sense of uncertainty.
“It’s certainly not irrational exuberance,” said Nandan Nilekani, co-chairman of Infosys, one of India’s best-known technology outsourcing firms. “There is a lot of introspection about what does this mean and when does it end.”
The downturn is exposing a deeper concern — India has become the world’s front office, handling customer service calls, and its back office, helping to process payments and run accounting and other computer systems. But it has not yet become the head office — making major new products, pioneering marketing techniques or helping to shape corporate strategy.
Rather than drowning US technology firms or work forces with a vast supply of cheap engineering talent, as some had feared, India — and Bangalore, its Silicon Valley — have continued to largely serve as the information economy’s version of manual labor.
“Historically, when it comes to innovation, Indian companies are relatively weak compared to the IBMs and Accentures of the world,” said Partha Iyengar, the head of research in India for the Gartner Group, which analyzes trends in the tech sector. “It has been their chronic Achilles’ heel.”
Last week’s coordinated terrorist attacks killed hundreds and brought Mumbai, India’s commercial capital, to a virtual halt. But long before that brutal shock, the country had been suffering the effects of the global slump, losing capital as Western investors fled to the security of US Treasuries, undermining Indian banks and company balance sheets.
Infosys recently scaled back its earnings projections for the year, telling investors that it now expects revenue to expand 13 percent to 15 percent, instead of the 19 percent to 21 percent it had forecast and far below the 30 percent annual expansion the company had been used to.
Like many of India’s outsourcing companies, Infosys is heavily dependent on the financial sector, deriving a third of its revenue from banks like Citigroup and Bank of America and other financial clients. Its fate is also closely tied to the US economy — two-thirds of its business comes from the US. Neither factor bodes well for the company’s prospects.
Technology Partners International, a consulting firm that publishes a widely watched index of global outsourcing deals, says its index is at a 10-year low.
“People think that outsourcing is a recession-proof industry. It is not,” said Siddharth Pai, a partner at the firm.
That realization has changed the boomtown atmosphere of Bangalore. Young workers still flock to a rooftop terrace on Residency Road every Wednesday night to grind to house and hip-hop music. But lately, the crowds at NYKS, an upscale nightclub, are a little thinner. They drink a little bit less. They talk a little less loudly.
“Now they are thinking twice before spending money,” said Supreeth Chandrasekhar, a 25-year-old disc jockey at NYKS.
Chandrasekhar also said that he used to perform at numerous corporate events, but that this business had largely disappeared.
In a country where most marriages are arranged by parents, the downturn has even taken a toll on the matrimonial prospects of those in technology outsourcing.
“Because there is no job guarantees for IT people, for the last six months brides’ families have not been accepting grooms from this background,” said Jagadeesh Angadi, a matchmaker in Bangalore.
The Indian National Association of Software and Service Companies estimates that the country’s technology sector will create 50,000 fewer jobs this year than last year, although it predicts the sector will still have added 200,000 workers by year’s end. India’s technology outsourcing companies have laid off about 10,000 employees since September.
Among the major players that have announced significant cutbacks in hiring is Satyam Computer Services, which slashed its recruitment plans to fewer than 10,000 from 15,000. Infosys, by contrast, has almost US$2 billion in cash on its balance sheet, a significant amount that can help it weather the downturn. It said it intended to follow through on plans to hire 25,000 workers this year.
“We made offers to people and we need to stand by them,” Nilekani said.
But some companies that have hired recruits are postponing their start dates. The deferrals allow companies, which once hired in anticipation of future business, to better manage overheads by adding staff only when they have confirmed projects.
A few so-called captive outsourcing operations — those that serve only their parent company in Europe or the US — have also cut back. American Express laid off some 200 of its 6,000 workers in India and Goldman Sachs announced last month that it would dismiss a similar number, or about 10 percent of its Indian work force.
For the moment, the industry has escaped large-scale job losses. Indian labor laws make it difficult for companies to drop workers and mass firings can draw a political outcry. Yet outsourcing companies have begun pruning workers, citing poor job performance, a way to quietly reduce labor costs without attracting much public scrutiny.
But India’s business leaders see opportunity in the downturn.
“Once things settle down, people will start looking at their business operations and how to make them more efficient and that is where we play,” Nilekani said.
Even consolidation on Wall Street, which may eliminate some Indian companies’ clients, could help Indian workers, outsourcing executives say. Mergers require technical skills to integrate disparate systems and there is a potential for profitable outsourcing work in areas like regulatory compliance. Banks are likely to be under stricter government scrutiny given the sense that lax oversight contributed to the financial crisis.
Raman Roy, chairman of Quatrro BPO Solutions, an outsourcing firm based in New Delhi, says he has 300 employees reviewing legal documents as part of bank mergers. Copal Partners, a company that uses employees in India to help investment banks do the sort of deal-based research normally performed by the bank’s junior analysts, has continued to expand even during the downturn.
Critics say that will not change the local industry’s basic competitive disadvantage — a creativity gap with Western competitors. Indian technology companies are too focused on increasing the efficiency of their internal systems, not improving their clients’ own industry-specific processes, said Navi Radjou, an analyst with Forrester Research.
“They are having trouble tailoring a technical application to a particular business need,” he said.
But India’s biggest tech outsourcing companies want to do as much as their European and US rivals, including expanding in Europe and the US. And the downturn may allow them to acquire talent — and even whole businesses — on the cheap.
The changes may come too late for workers like Vikram Hathwar.
In July, Hathwar, a 22-year-old engineer, graduated from a technical college with a job offer from a software developer. But instead of starting his job he has been waiting in vain for a letter from the company telling him when to report for work.
“I called them and they said they would be calling two or three months later, but still they have not informed me anything about when I should start,” Hathwar said.
In the meantime, he has begun looking for a temporary job. But he said most tech businesses were no longer hiring recent graduates. The few that are have begun asking applicants to intern for several months without pay and with no guarantee of a permanent position.
“The recession has made for all these pressures on us,” Hathwar said. “It is very confusing to know what to do.”
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS