Martin Luther King’s death in 1968 was not harvested as a political asset until this year’s presidential election.
The reaper, Barack Obama, has been incorrectly identified as slave offspring; his family name is unevenly homonymized with a notorious terrorist. Both could have undermined his career as a politician.
The half-Kenyan, as young and charming as former president John F. Kennedy, satisfies a nostalgic call for a vigorous and hopeful leader who has the potential to lead the country out of the woods. As diligent and confident as his fellow citizens, he is a role model that best illustrates the American Dream.
As the first black American to rise to the highest political office, he is expected to change the lone superpower in various ways. With his wit and willpower, he has not only won the hearts of the majority of Americans, but has drawn global attention.
The Economist showed that Obama was supported by more than 90 percent of respondents in a survey covering 56 countries. Quoting an Oxford professor, Newsweek interpreted the result as indicating that “a progressive leader” would be expected to “restore America’s moral leadership.” Even some Japanese who live in a small town called Obama and Kenyans in general are delighted.
An array of stories and events associated with the Obama frenzy begs the question: Will the US change? To be more specific, will it change into a more humble power?
An unspoken corollary of this question deserves clarification. It is based on the assumption that Obama as president, with an ethnic minority background, will tend to be more empathetic toward other states. Partly because of growing economic problems, the new government may not be as unilaterally tough as previous administrations when dealing with issues like nuclear weapons and terrorism that have long haunted the nation.
However, the corollary doesn’t hold if placed against the national interest and US history. The following philosophy remains deeply rooted in the American mindset and prevalent throughout the world: If nuclear weapons are secured by those with evil tendencies, then that is a threat to the US and the whole world.
Obama has always been clear on such matters. As he said in his victory speech, the American people will continue to defeat “those who would tear the world down” and support “those who seek peace and security.”
Regimes deemed unfriendly to the US, such as Venezuela, Cuba and Iran, have sent congratulations to Obama for winning the election and their unusual gesture suggested that North Korean leader Kim Jong-il did not share the sentiment.
Asked recently about future dialogue between his country and the Obama administration, a North Korean diplomat, despite being cautiously optimistic, implied that the US should change first. This does not explain why the US government would possibly yield at the negotiating table.
Obama’s succession is likely to be a more conventional transfer of power than some might think, though it will encourage and inspire people everywhere. Because belief in change is widespread and because there is considerable scope for change, many can’t wait to see the degree to which a nation in ethnic and political flux will transform itself.
But one thing will never change: America is more humble, in its own way, though not in a way that suggests cowardice or weakness. That has nothing to do with whether the president is black or white.
Chang Chi-yu holds a doctorate in American Studies from Tamkang University and is an associate professor in the Department of Applied English at Ming Chuan University.
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
Chung Yuan ChristiaN University is clearly in bed with the People’s Republic of China. This can be the only explanation why the school’s authorities have done their utmost to shield a student, who lodged a complaint against an associate professor, and then used thuggish tactics to compel the teacher to issue two separate apologies to China. The original complaint, filed by an unnamed Chinese student, was for remarks by associate professor Chao Ming-wei (招名威) during a class on the origin of COVID-19. A second complaint was filed by the same student after Chao, during an apology, stated that he was a
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in her inaugural address on May 20 firmly said: “We will not accept the Beijing authorities’ use of ‘one country, two systems’ to downgrade Taiwan and undermine the cross-strait status quo.” The Chinese government was not too happy, and later that day, an opinion piece on the Web site of China’s state broadcaster China Central Television said: “While Tsai’s first inaugural address four years ago was read by Beijing as an ‘unfinished answer sheet,’ the one she presented this time was even more below-par.” Speaking to the China Review News Agency, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies vice president
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to wreak havoc worldwide. Despite countries being under pressure economically and from the novel coronavirus, China’s National People’s Congress last month passed national security legislation for Hong Kong, a decision that has shocked the world. Let there be no doubt: This move is the beginning of the end of China’s plans for “one country, two systems” in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Proposed amendments to extradition laws last year ignited massive protests in Hong Kong, with millions of participants, shocking the world and making confrontation between government forces and those who opposed the change a permanent part of Hong