The legislature has formed a review committee for the by-election of the board of the Public Television Service (PTS) Foundation. The committee members proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) include four KMT legislators — Diane Lee (李慶安), Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), Kung Wen-chi (孔文吉) and Kuo Su-chun (郭素春).
This is a clear violation of Article 13 of the Public Television Act (公共電視法), which states: “The Legislative Yuan shall recommend 11 to 13 just and fair people from society to form the PTS Directors and Supervisors Review Committee.”
The law is designed to maintain the independence of PTS staff and exclude the legislature from directly interfering in staff reviews. The KMT is clearly breaking the law.
Not only that, since the government of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) came to power, it has been passive and has not presented any plan to promote PTS or other radio or TV stations. Instead, the public has only witnessed questionable and inappropriate interference in the personnel affairs of public media outlets. This raises fears that the KMT is returning to its old ways when it comes to its media policies.
This is not the first time that the KMT caucus has violated the law. When the legislature reviewed the nominees for the PTS board last November, the KMT-appointed committee members were Kung and Su Chi (蘇起), drawing criticism from media reform organizations.
At the time, the criticism against the whole nomination and review process included criticism of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for adopting a low-key, closed-door approach. Both the KMT and DPP are guilty of manipulating PTS personnel affairs.
Unfortunately, since the KMT returned to power, it has not only neglected to correct the DPP’s faults, but it is repeating them by attempting to appoint four legislators as committee members.
Since Ma came to power, he has been troubled by the global financial crisis and several natural and manmade disasters, which have stirred public discontent. However, the success of the local movie Cape No. 7 (海角七號) is evidence that developing the cultural and media industries is the easiest way to make an impact. These two industries also have the best economic potential and are most effective when it comes to stabilizing and calming the social and cultural environment.
If only the Ma administration could break the old authoritarian habit of interfering with the media and show that its policies are superior to the DPP’s by quickly proposing concrete, effective and visionary media policies, it might still be able to save its falling approval ratings.
On the other hand, misguided media and cultural policies would have an extremely negative effect, probably far beyond anything the Ma administration could imagine.
Wei Ti is an assistant professor at National Chiao Tung University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers