Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) has proposed measures to boost the real estate market, including an offer of NT$200 billion (US$6.2 billion) in preferential mortgage loans by the central bank and increasing interest rate subsidies to 0.625 percent. This, however, is not the right way to deal with the issue.
The mortgage policy is based on the assumption that many people want to buy a house but cannot borrow enough money from the bank or else fear that interest rates are too high and that they won’t be able to cope.
Yet if we examine a few figures, we will find that there is a great discrepancy between the actual situation in the real estate market and the Cabinet’s understanding of it.
Central bank statistics show that there is still more than NT$110 billion remaining in preferential mortgage loans and that only NT$300 million to NT$400 million of this is loaned out each month.
In addition, the total amount lent by commercial banks still falls far below the statutory 30 percent cap on a bank’s funds that are committed to housing loans.
In other words, banks still have sufficient cash for mortgage loans. This shows that the problem has nothing to do with the public being unable to borrow money.
Is the problem, then, that interest rates are so high that they prevent the public from buying a house?
The fact is that some banks have offered interest rates that are 0.25 percent lower than the government’s preferential mortgage loans, but there has still been only limited growth in such loans. So the answer is no.
The real problem is that house prices are too high and incomes too low. If incomes increased with house prices, then at least some people would be able to borrow, or consider borrowing, money to buy a house.
Yet, in reality, with increasing domestic inflation and soaring commodity prices — the Consumer Price Index rose from 4.97 percent in June to 5.92 percent in July — not only did incomes not rise, but inflation also caused real income to see the largest negative growth in 20 years.
The second-largest drop of the indexes in the Consumer Sentiment Index survey for last month — conducted by the Research Center for Taiwan Economic Development at National Central University — was the expectations index for household finances over the next six months.
If more and more people think incomes will not increase or may decrease in the next six months, how could they even consider buying a house?
The survey also showed that the Durable Consumer Goods Index, which is closely linked to the real estate industry, dropped by 1.5 points to 97.65 points last month. These are reflections of the public’s conservative approach to purchasing a house at this time.
The Cabinet has made a mistake in its economic measures that aim to revive the real estate market by failing to clearly understand the real problem. The problem is not the policy itself, but a complete misreading of the situation by the premier, his ministers and their advisers.
Lu Chun-wei is a research fellow in the Department of Finance and Economics at Taiwan Thinktank.
Translated by Ted Yang
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS