The Lobbying Act (遊說法) approved on Aug. 8 last year officially took effect this Aug. 8 after a familiarity period that seems to have passed almost unnoticed. We should look into whether the act, which is seen as one of the “sunshine bills,” will make lobbying activities more transparent, or will represent a barrier to the public’s right to petition and to the development of Taiwan’s already struggling civil society.
The act stipulates that any non-governmental organization (NGO) or individual that wishes to lobby the legislature or other administrative agencies must first register with the lobbied agency. No NGO will be allowed to engage in lobbying unrelated to articles of the association. This raises the question of what exactly the authorities consider to be “related.”
If a women’s NGO plans to lobby against a tax policy that affects the distribution of family income, would that be considered related to women’s issues?
The registration system is a “licensing system” whereby obtaining official approval is necessary for lobbying actions. This process may take as long as two months. This is a major limitation of petition rights that approaches a violation of the Constitution.
The act does not offer an “emergency registration system” to meet the lobbying needs of Taiwan’s very fluid political environment. This is another obstacle that no doubt will present many difficulties.
A closer look at the act reveals that the definition of lobbying is unclear and can be manipulated. Using an assistant to “express opinions” to legislators and administrative officials is a way to bypass the act. Assistants wield great influence over elected officials, making it convenient for lobbyists to use this method.
Another issue is whether a claim to be “petitioning” or “making a plea” rather than “lobbying” would undermine the act.
The act has a regulation saying a lobbyist must pass the Senior Examination for Civil Service Personnel, hold a certificate and be in business. However it is very hard to see any link between the exam and one’s suitability for lobbying.
And what is the reason for allowing “foreigners” and “foreign groups” to lobby while disallowing people from China, Hong Kong and Macau? We should examine whether this will encourage people from China, Hong Kong and Macau to carry out “informal” lobbying.
Who will monitor the disclosure requirements mentioned in the act and exactly what sort of disclosure mechanisms have been designed for public officials? It is hard to understand why penalties are aimed only at lobbyists and not at those who are being lobbied in connection to undisclosed information.
One cannot see how a “sunshine bill” so full of loopholes can promote transparency. The complicated details of the registration process are likely to increase the burden of already financially stretched NGOs.
These regulations run counter to the development of civil society and will block NGOs that want to engage in public welfare-related lobbying activities. Ignoring the fact that a group violating the Lobbying Act risks fines ranging from NT$50,000 to NT$2.5 million, I’m afraid this “sunshine bill” will be unable to control the lobbying of underground groups and will very likely block channels for expressing opinions on public affairs to legislators and Cabinet members.
The Lobbying Act reflects the total ignorance among legislators of the development of civil society and the absurdities of NGO-related legislation. Unfortunately, the abovementioned problems are just the beginning of the government’s misguided attempt to manage lobbying.
Liu Ching-yi is an associate professor in the Graduate Institute of National Development at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.