The Lobbying Act (遊說法) approved on Aug. 8 last year officially took effect this Aug. 8 after a familiarity period that seems to have passed almost unnoticed. We should look into whether the act, which is seen as one of the “sunshine bills,” will make lobbying activities more transparent, or will represent a barrier to the public’s right to petition and to the development of Taiwan’s already struggling civil society.
The act stipulates that any non-governmental organization (NGO) or individual that wishes to lobby the legislature or other administrative agencies must first register with the lobbied agency. No NGO will be allowed to engage in lobbying unrelated to articles of the association. This raises the question of what exactly the authorities consider to be “related.”
If a women’s NGO plans to lobby against a tax policy that affects the distribution of family income, would that be considered related to women’s issues?
The registration system is a “licensing system” whereby obtaining official approval is necessary for lobbying actions. This process may take as long as two months. This is a major limitation of petition rights that approaches a violation of the Constitution.
The act does not offer an “emergency registration system” to meet the lobbying needs of Taiwan’s very fluid political environment. This is another obstacle that no doubt will present many difficulties.
A closer look at the act reveals that the definition of lobbying is unclear and can be manipulated. Using an assistant to “express opinions” to legislators and administrative officials is a way to bypass the act. Assistants wield great influence over elected officials, making it convenient for lobbyists to use this method.
Another issue is whether a claim to be “petitioning” or “making a plea” rather than “lobbying” would undermine the act.
The act has a regulation saying a lobbyist must pass the Senior Examination for Civil Service Personnel, hold a certificate and be in business. However it is very hard to see any link between the exam and one’s suitability for lobbying.
And what is the reason for allowing “foreigners” and “foreign groups” to lobby while disallowing people from China, Hong Kong and Macau? We should examine whether this will encourage people from China, Hong Kong and Macau to carry out “informal” lobbying.
Who will monitor the disclosure requirements mentioned in the act and exactly what sort of disclosure mechanisms have been designed for public officials? It is hard to understand why penalties are aimed only at lobbyists and not at those who are being lobbied in connection to undisclosed information.
One cannot see how a “sunshine bill” so full of loopholes can promote transparency. The complicated details of the registration process are likely to increase the burden of already financially stretched NGOs.
These regulations run counter to the development of civil society and will block NGOs that want to engage in public welfare-related lobbying activities. Ignoring the fact that a group violating the Lobbying Act risks fines ranging from NT$50,000 to NT$2.5 million, I’m afraid this “sunshine bill” will be unable to control the lobbying of underground groups and will very likely block channels for expressing opinions on public affairs to legislators and Cabinet members.
The Lobbying Act reflects the total ignorance among legislators of the development of civil society and the absurdities of NGO-related legislation. Unfortunately, the abovementioned problems are just the beginning of the government’s misguided attempt to manage lobbying.
Liu Ching-yi is an associate professor in the Graduate Institute of National Development at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China