President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) once criticized former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) push for a national name change, saying Chen ruined the issue by causing a sensation. He was right: Some Taiwanese organizations in the US, such as the Taiwan External Trade Development Council, had already changed their names, but after Chen’s move, Washington blocked any further changes.
Some independence fundamentalists feel that the name change/sovereignty issues are of overriding importance. Focused on politics, they are too impatient to make detailed plans, instead proposing rash, rough-hewn policies. Rather than speeding things up, this slows everything down. Similarly, the pan-blue camp is inflexible in pushing its own economic interests in cross-strait relations: Once again, “haste makes waste.”
Last Friday, Ma said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal that Taiwan should speed up negotiations for fly-beyond rights via China to Europe — a suggestion that was criticized by airlines as rash. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government pushed something similar in the 1990s, when then-premier Vincent Siew’s (蕭萬長) Cabinet wanted to make Taiwan an offshore transshipment center. However, the half-baked approach resulted in China agreeing to only open smaller ports like Xiamen and Wenzhou for indirect links with Keelung and Kaohsiung, while the five biggest ports remained closed to Taiwan.
In his book Governing by Expertise, Siew describes Kaohsiung harbor’s superior geographical location as an Asia-Pacific transshipment center and how Chinese harbors could ship cargo on small and medium-sized ships to Kaohsiung for transshipment, turning them into Kaohsiung satellite ports.
Siew also said that direct flights would mean Chinese electronics components would be shipped to Taiwan for value-added assembly prior to export. The reality is after the completion of Shanghai’s Yangshan port, cargo that used to be transshipped in Busan, South Korea, is returning to Shanghai, proving how ridiculous it is to view Chinese ports as satellites.
The Asia-Pacific transshipment center idea shows that contrary to popular opinion, the KMT is not always willing to be taken advantage of by China. Instead, it is drafting unrealistic plans on how Taiwan can unilaterally take advantage of China economically while giving in politically. The result is the KMT loses political capital, while the establishment of cross-strait economic order cannot be established.
Ma is right to demand that Taiwanese airlines obtain fly-beyond rights to Europe. He forgets, however, that Taiwan should allow China the same rights to serve the US from Taiwan. Business must be a win-win proposition to succeed.
Sea transportation talks with China are another example of diving into talks without thorough planning. Some politicians and businesses believe that Taiwan should designate cross-strait transportation as a domestic matter to be able to monopolize business and bar foreign carriers. The result would be that Taiwan loses big business to gain a small advantage.
For cross-strait sea and air transportation to benefit both sides of the Taiwan Strait, there must be a global strategy. Ma’s administration thinks that Taiwan’s global interests lie in China alone, and it wants to monopolize cross-strait benefits without trying to understand where China’s interests lie. If the government doesn’t change this approach, cross-strait misunderstandings will only proliferate and nothing will be achieved.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG AND PERRY SVENSSON
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past