Regardless of the enthusiasm and criticism surrounding the Beijing Olympics, it is clear these Games have been a massive political project. Beijing’s slogan of fulfilling China’s “100-year dream” of hosting the Olympics refers not only to its Olympic bid, but also to its longing to become a world power.
The Beijing Olympics have represented many world firsts, from the highest spending and highest number of participating countries and athletes to the unmatched service of Olympic volunteers. Beijing International Airport completed its Terminal 3 especially for the Games, said to be the world’s biggest terminal. However, Beijing may also be remembered as the Olympics that expelled the most people from their homes.
The opening ceremony created more world firsts: the largest number of national leaders in attendance, the most expensive fireworks, the most performers and the biggest sports team China has ever put together.
What do all these world firsts tell the world? Do they reveal China’s wealth, manpower and modernization, or indicate the efficiency of its authoritarian rule? It is also worth asking how China will seek to improve its image after the Games.
The opening ceremony deserves consideration. Choreographed by renowned Chinese director Zhang Yimou (張藝謀), the celebration was a combination of money, technology, countless performers and carefully selected Chinese traditions. Still, all the visual and audio effects could not cover the lack of content. The present and future are the only things that can truly capture the hearts of a people, not history. China seems unable to provide the world with new ideas and imagination and failed even when it tried to link the legend of Chang E (嫦娥), the fabled lady who ran to the moon, to astronauts.
In considering China’s “peaceful rise,” some Chinese intellectuals ask how the US, with only a few hundred years of culture, can make effective use of the world’s cultural assets, while China, an ancient civilization with thousands of years of culture, cannot? They know that apart from political dominance, military strength, the economy and mass media, the US has built its cultural hegemony by exporting Western democracy and the “American dream.”
So what should China export to the world — the ideals of Mao Zedong (毛澤東)? The sensationalized utopianism that swept China during the Cultural Revolution has faded and revolution has been replaced with the flow of international capital. And what ever happened to “socialism with Chinese characteristics?” Even Chinese officials now admit this “theory” — a combination of Stalinism and capitalism — is embarrassing and unattractive.
During the opening ceremony, Zhang used the Chinese character he (和), meaning “peace” or “harmony,” as a centerpiece. Many proponents of Confucianism or socialism with Chinese characteristics claim that the most significant difference between the Chinese and Western civilizations lies in the competitiveness encouraged in Western societies and the harmony encouraged in China.
Regardless of whether this theory applies to Chinese history, the world is watching China’s self-proclaimed “peaceful rise.” Under an authoritarian government, a “harmonious society” is merely a slogan. In reality the Chinese need to face the tough competition brought on by the global market economy.
There is still a long way to go if China wants to use peace and harmony as ideological weapons in its rise to power. Soon China will have fulfilled its Olympic dream. But this dream is not yet a “Chinese dream” that will win the admiration of people across the globe.
Yang Wei-chung is a social activist.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry